May neuroscience be lawyers’ weapon?

Journal Title: Current Problems of Psychiatry - Year 2014, Vol 15, Issue 4

Abstract

For ages, philosophy, ethics and legal sciences have been focusing on explaining issues like morality, free will, responsibility and guilt. This research is increasingly referring to achievements of science and technology in examination of the structures of the nervous system, their activity and roles they play in psychic processes. In order to draw conclusions about penal responsibility based on the scans of criminals’ brains, we need a serious, well-verified knowledge providing information about what kind of brain activity is linked to free will and which poses a threat to it. The results of the examination using the fMRI are incredibly interesting and they have been very fruitful in recent years. Blood-flow visualization techniques showing chosen areas of the brain are now available. The technology of pattern analysis in many volumetric elements (voxels) has been a real breakthrough. It identifies patterns using the data generated by fMRI and this enables the researcher to find a link between psychic phenomena and the observed patterns of brain activity. Authors present chosen situations in which responsibility for the committed act gives rise to a number of doubts with respect to the factors affecting the structure and activity of the brain. Social issues connected with the sense of safety and belief in existing legal order cannot be omitted because the law and judicature are considered to be the rightful fundaments of civilization. Achievements in medical science, psychology and philosophy are increasingly becoming the subject of discussion concerning legal issues, like decisions of courts. Yet, there is a need for some further research which may improve the earnest and objective analysis of these issues. Would neuroscience ever be lawyers’ main argument? If so, when could it be really helpful? It goes without saying that the nearest future will bring answers to these questions.

Authors and Affiliations

Nikodem Skoczeń, Marcin Olajossy

Keywords

Related Articles

Polish adaptation and validation of Women's Experience With Battering Scale (WEB Scale)

Aim. The aim of this study was to adapt the Women's Experience With Battering Scale (WEB) to Polish conditions, as well as to as-sess psychometric properties of the Scale. The WEB Scale measures emotional abuse, perceive...

Stanisław Dutkiewicz – talent wyzwolony przez chorobę

Stanisław Dutkiewicz żył w latach 1923 – 2003, z wykształcenia był prawnikiem, znany jako malarz i grafik, mieszkał w Grodzisku Mazowieckim. Zachorował dość wcześnie na zaburzenia afektywne dwubiegunowe i leczony był z t...

Experiences of parents of children hospitalized in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: coping strategies, perceived stress and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder

Introduction: Hospitalization of a newborn in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is associated with high levels of stress in the parents. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to evaluate stress coping strate...

Relations in the families of women at risk and not at risk of mobile phone addiction

The aim of this work was to verify the hypothesis that there are statistically significant differences between women at risk and not at risk of mobile phone addiction in their relationships with their parents. Material...

Overweight and obesity vs. Metabolic complications In a group of persons with intellectual disabilities. Preliminary study

Introduction: Obesity is a major health problem within the population of those with intellectual disabilities. It carries with it a number of negative health consequences that lead to, inter alia, overpressure of the blo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP100438
  • DOI -
  • Views 149
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nikodem Skoczeń, Marcin Olajossy (2014). May neuroscience be lawyers’ weapon?. Current Problems of Psychiatry, 15(4), 202-209. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-100438