Memory retrieval processes help explain the incumbency advantage

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2017, Vol 12, Issue 2

Abstract

Voters prefer political candidates who are currently in office (incumbents) over new candidates (challengers). Using the premise of query theory (Johnson, Häubl & Keinan, 2007), we clarify the underlying cognitive mechanisms by asking whether memory retrieval sequences affect political decision making. Consistent with predictions, Experiment 1 (N = 256) replicated the incumbency advantage and showed that participants tended to first query information about the incumbent. Experiment 2 (N = 427) showed that experimentally manipulating participants’ query order altered the strength of the incumbency advantage. Experiment 3 (N = 713) replicated Experiment 1 and, in additional experimental conditions, showed that the effects of incumbency can be overridden by more valid cues, like the candidates’ ideology. Participants queried information about ideologically similar candidates earlier and also preferred these ideologically similar candidates. This is initial evidence for a cognitive, memory-retrieval process underling the incumbency advantage and political decision making.

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Katharina Spälti, Mark J. Brandt and Marcel Zeelenberg

Keywords

Related Articles

The boundary effect: Perceived post hoc accuracy of prediction intervals

Predictions of magnitudes (costs, durations, environmental events) are often given as uncertainty intervals (ranges). When are such forecasts judged to be correct? We report results of four experiments showing that forec...

Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation: Implications for alternative consideration when response options are not provided

This paper reports two experiments comparing variants of multiple explanation applied in the early stages of a judgment task (a case involving employee theft) where participants are not given a menu of response options....

How to measure time preferences: An experimental comparison of three methods

In two studies, time preferences for financial gains and losses at delays of up to 50 years were elicited using three different methods: matching, fixed-sequence choice titration, and a dynamic “staircase” choice method....

Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options

Using five variants of the Asian Disease Problem, we dissected the risky-choice framing effect by requiring each participant to provide preference ratings for the full decision problem and also to provide attractiveness...

Interpersonal effects of expressed anger and sorrow in morally charged negotiation

The expression of emotion can play a significant role in strategic decision-making. In this study, we hypothesized that emotion expression alters behavior in morally charged negotiation. We investigated the impact of fac...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678286
  • DOI -
  • Views 116
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Anna Katharina Spälti, Mark J. Brandt and Marcel Zeelenberg (2017). Memory retrieval processes help explain the incumbency advantage. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678286