Menilai Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan

Journal Title: Lentera Hukum - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

This writing examines the consideration of judge to the decision concerning violence case according to Article 170 KUHP (Criminal Code) and evaluates conformity of decision with the provision of Article 197 Paragraph (1) KUHAP (Criminal Procedure Code) in the case of violence happened in Mojokerto. It takes into account of the judge to decide consideration which has the consequence of a decision made by the judge void by law. It uses statute and conceptual approaches analyzed through Article 170 KUHP and Article 197 Paragraph (1) KUHAP linked to the doctrine of experts to corroborate argument from the authors. In conclusion, this research considers the statement of the judge that the defendant guilty of a criminal offense according to Article 170 Paragraph 1 KUHP does not conform with the fact in the court wherein the court it is obtained the explanation from the witness that the letter of Visum et Repertum and a statement of the defendant done are exercised by the defendants caused casualties sustained. In addition, in making decision, the judge does not refer to Article 197 Paragraph (1) letter d and h so in which the decision should be declared void by law.

Authors and Affiliations

Lela Tyas Eka Prihatining Cahya, Dwi Endah Nurhayati, Dodik Prihatin AN

Keywords

Related Articles

Menilai Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan

This writing examines the consideration of judge to the decision concerning violence case according to Article 170 KUHP (Criminal Code) and evaluates conformity of decision with the provision of Article 197 Paragraph (1)...

Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi yang Berkualifikasi

Integrity, good character, justice, and expert statesman of the constitution as the indicators to appoint Constitutional Judge should be taken into account by the Supreme Court, the House, and the President in the select...

Implementasi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Laut Nasional Terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintah Provinsi Kepulauan Riau

Riau Islands Province is an island-based region consisting of a group of islands. The Province has a very strategic geographic location due to bordering the neighboring countries in Southeast Asia, viz. Singapore, Brunei...

Cerai Gugat Akibat Murtad (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Palu No: 0249/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Pal)

Marriage can be over when one of the parties becomes apostate in which apostate may cause problems of housewifery. In this research, it argues that the judge adopts a verdict according to the Law Number 1/ 1974 and Compi...

Perjudian Online: Kajian Pidana atas Putusan Nomor 1033/PID.B/2014/PN.BDG

Law Number 11 / 2008 on Information and Electronic Transaction (UU ITE) is the regulation concerning on criminal law in addition to the Criminal Code (KUHP). UU ITE is commonly regarded additional regulation of the Crimi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP278763
  • DOI 10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.4494
  • Views 135
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Lela Tyas Eka Prihatining Cahya, Dwi Endah Nurhayati, Dodik Prihatin AN (2017). Menilai Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan. Lentera Hukum, 4(1), 47-62. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-278763