Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy

Journal Title: Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal - Year 2015, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to assess whether significant meniscal extrusion of more than 3 mm or of even lesser degrees of extrusion could be considered significant. We also aimed to determine the morphology of tears that are most likely to be associated with significant extrusion. Study design and material. The study was done retrospectively on a group of 202 patients (157 males and 45 females) who had been seen in our hospital between 2007 and 2011 with meniscal tears (in one knee only) diagnosed by MRI and confirmed on arthroscopy. Extrusion of 3 mm or more (usually considered significant) was seen in 102 cases and less than 3 mm in 100. Extrusion was measured on the coronal MR images rather than on saggital images because of ease and reproducibility. The tears were confirmed by arthroscopy and correlated with the extent of extrusion on MRI. Results: Out of the total of 202 cases, 102 cases (50.5%) had extrusion of 3 mm or more on MRI. Of these, the medial meniscal posterior horn tears accounted for 63 cases (64.26%), 21 cases were medial meniscal body tears (21.42%), five medial meniscal root tears (5.1%), nine lateral meniscal body tears (9.18%) and four lateral meniscal posterior horn tears(4.08%). Forty-four cases had extrusion of 3-4 mm, 26 had extrusion of 4-5mm, 17 cases had extrusion of 5-6mm, ten had extrusion of 6-7mm and five had extrusion of 7 mm or more. One hundred cases fell in the < 3mm extrusion category, of which 80 ( 39.6%) were in the 2-3 mm extrusion group and 20 (9.9%) in the 1-2 mm extrusion group. They comprised of 61 cases of medial meniscal posterior horn tears, 23 cases of medial meniscal body tears, six medial meniscal root tears, eight lateral meniscal body tears and two lateral meniscal posterior horn tears. The highest proportion of meniscal tears was seen in the 2-3 mm category comprising nearly 40% of the entire study group. The majority of tears were medial meniscal posterior horn tears. Conclusion: Menisci that extruded 2-3 mm from the tibial margin formed a major proportion of menisci treated for tears by repair or menisectomy. We should consider extrusion of more than 2mm as significant. Most tears had extrusion of 2-4 mm.

Authors and Affiliations

Muzaffar N, Kirmani O, Ahsan M, Ahmad S

Keywords

Related Articles

Bilateral radial neck fractures – A Case Report

Radial head and neck fractures are the most frequently seen elbow fractures. The usual cause of this injury is a fall onto an outstretched hand with a partly flexed elbow. We report here an unusual case of bilateral non-...

Closed Intramedullary Locking Nailing for Metacarpal Fractures: A Retrospective Study of Sixty-Six Fractures

Introduction: Metacarpal fractures are frequent injuries in the young male working population and the majority are treated non-operatively. There is a growing trend to surgically treat these fractures, with the aim of re...

Outcome Determinants of Patients with Traumatic Pelvic Fractures: A Cohort Study in a Level I Trauma Center in Southern Iran

Pelvic fracture is a result of devastating injuries and is usually encountered in conjunction with other life-threatening injuries. The aim of the current study was to determine the outcome determinants of patients with...

Economic Impact of Managing Acute Diabetic Foot Infection in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia

Diabetic foot disease is the leading cause of non-traumatic amputations of the lower limb, hence a major health care and socioeconomic burden. It has been found that most of the costs occur in the inpatient setting; ther...

The Role of Real Time Ultrasound in Differentiating between Osteomyelitis and Tumour in Long Bones

Aim: This study was designed to evaluate the use of ultrasound in diagnosis of infection and tumour of long bones. Methodology: Patients referred from the orthopaedic unit with doubt regarding long bone clinical and/or...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP308258
  • DOI 10.5704/MOJ.1507.013
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Muzaffar N, Kirmani O, Ahsan M, Ahmad S (2015). Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 9(2), 17-20. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-308258