Mentoring medical students by their Peers, Three Years’ experience at Shiraz Medical School
Journal Title: Journal of Advanced Medical Sciences and Applied Technologies - Year 2019, Vol 7, Issue 3
Abstract
Dear Editor In respect of the scientific and cultural aspects of medical universities, the necessity of availing new methods is absolutely evident (1, 2). In mentorship programs an experienced student (mentor) takes the responsibility of orientation and guidance of a number of firstyear students (mentees) (3). Mentoring is a twoway communication between the mentor and the mentees to achieve educational objectives (4-6). In this process students receive guidance from senior students and professors on how to deal with challenges more effectively (7). There are some previous articles about mentorship programs in some medical schools all over the world such as India and the USA (3, 8-10). In this letter we aimed to briefly explain activities carried out by mentoring teams of Shiraz Medical School, as one of the leading medical schools in the field of mentoring (11). The mentoring program at Shiraz Medical School started in July 2015, inviting fifteen high ranked medical students with expertise in communication skills, studying in the 3rd or 5th semesters. Some workshops about new teaching and learning methods, new assessment methods, communication skills and effective consulting techniques were held for mentors by expert faculties. Three mentees were assigned to one mentor. In choosing mentees for each mentor good communication between the mentor and the mentees were considered. Afterwards, the central committee of mentorship was developed with supervision of an experienced full professor academic who was expert in the field of medical education. This central committee gave advice to mentor and mentees about study skills, laboratory skills, communication skills, team work, and research techniques. At the end of the first year, a selfconstructed valid and reliable questionnaire was given to the mentees to assess the effectiveness of mentoring and goal achievements. The questionnaire consisted of 5 questions about the impact of mentoring on the first year of the medical school. Primary evidence showed that 53 percent of the mentees believed that mentoring had a great impact on helping them in adjusting faster to the new conditions. Also a statistically significant increase of grade point average was seen in mentees’ scores in comparison to their classmates that had not participated in the mentoring program. Following the outcomes of the mentoring program in 2016, the mentoring group expanded its activity and accepted a number of international students as mentees, in addition to Iranian students. Meanwhile some other experienced mentors were added to the mentoring group. Mentoring was introduced to new students during a meeting and among them about a 100 voluntarily enrolled in the program as mentees. In its third year of activity the mentoring program has extended its activity to the mentoring of international students (considering their relative lack of proficiency of the Persian language, and relative unfamiliarity with the Iranian culture and the education system in Iran). The mentees’ average grades at the end of the second year, showed a significant increase among international mentees. The average grade of international students, who had mentors, was 15.7 out of 20, while that of the international students of previous years (i.e. international students who had not benefited from mentoring) was 12.1, 14.7, and 13 out of 20, respectively. Besides, more expert faculties from different disciplines got involved in the program. We believed that every successful medical student should help other young medical students who enter medical school each year.
Authors and Affiliations
SULMAZ GHAHRAMANI, FATEMEH SEDDIGH, ALI REZA TORABI JAHROMI, AAZAM KHANDEL, PARISA NEMATOLLAHI, ZAHRA HASHEMPOOR, AMIRALI I RASTEGAR KAZEROON
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP664654
- DOI 10.30476/jamp.2019.45018
- Views 83
- Downloads 0
How to develop an undergraduate medical professionalism curriculum: Experts’ perception and suggestion
Introduction: Medical professionalism as a main ability of physicians is very important just like its teaching and learning. This study investigated medical professionalism experts’ perspectives and experiences about pro...
The implementation of unique, active learning tools in post-graduate training
Dear Editor I read the prospective study by Patrick et al., The Usefulness of Crossword Puzzle as a Self-Learning Tool in Pharmacology (1), with great interest. “Crossword puzzles provide expansion of vocabulary, stimula...
Emotional intelligence skills: is nurses’ stress and professional competence related to their emotional intelligence training? a quasi experimental study
Introduction: Emotional intelligence is a social skill that controls stress and affects one’s ability to cope with the demands and environmental pressures; it so can improve professional competence in health care provide...
The impact of a high fidelity simulation-based debriefing course on the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH)© score of novice instructors
Introduction: Experiential learning, followed by debriefing, is at the heart of Simulation-Based Medical Education (SBME) and has been proven effective to help master several medical skills. We investigated the impact of...
Use of concept map as a reinforcement tool in undergraduate curriculum: an analytical study
Introduction: Ever-expanding medical literature demands successful amalgamation of huge information and clinical practice for budding doctors. This study aimed to find the effectiveness of the concept map, a novel method...