Methodological pitfalls of the Unconscious Thought paradigm

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 7

Abstract

According to Unconscious Thought Theory (UTT: Dijksterhuis & Nordgren, 2006), complex decisions are best made after a period of distraction assumed to elicit “unconscious thought”. Over three studies, respectively offering a conceptual, an identical and a methodologically improved replication of Dijksterhuis et al. (2006), we reassessed UTT’s predictions and dissected the decision task used to demonstrate these predictions. We failed to find any evidence for the benefits of unconscious decision-making. By contrast, we found some evidence that conscious deliberation can lead to better decisions. Further, we identified methodological weaknesses in the UTT decision task: (a) attributes weighting was neglected although attributes were seen as different in importance; (b) the material was not properly counterbalanced; and (c) there was some confusion in the experimental instructions. We propose methodological improvements that address these concerns.

Authors and Affiliations

Laurent Waroquier, David Marchiori, Olivier Klein and Axel Cleeremans

Keywords

Related Articles

Synergistic effects of voting and enforcement on internalized motivation to cooperate in a resource dilemma

We used psychological methods to investigate how two prominent interventions, participatory decision making and enforcement, influence voluntary cooperation in a common-pool resource dilemma. Groups (N=40) harvested reso...

Cognitive reflection as a predictor of susceptibility to behavioral anomalies

To study the effect of cognitive reflection on behavioral anomalies, we used the cognitive reflection test to measure cognitive reflection. The study was conducted on 395 Iranian university students and shows that subjec...

Are patient decision aids effective? Insight from revisiting the debate between correspondence and coherence theories of judgment

Research endeavors to determine the effectiveness of patient decision aids (PtDAs) have yielded mixed results. The conflicting evaluations are largely due to the different metrics used to assess the validity of judgments...

Who helps more? How self-other discrepancies influence decisions in helping situations

Research has shown that people perceive themselves as less biased than others, and as better than average in many favorable characteristics. We suggest that these types of biased perceptions regarding intentions and beha...

On the generality of the effect of experiencing prior gains and losses on the Iowa Gambling Task: A study on young and old adults

Prospect Theory predicts that people tend to be more risk seeking if their reference point is perceived as a loss and more risk averse when the reference point is perceived as a gain. In line with this prediction, Franke...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677715
  • DOI -
  • Views 169
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Laurent Waroquier, David Marchiori, Olivier Klein and Axel Cleeremans (2009). Methodological pitfalls of the Unconscious Thought paradigm. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677715