MOBILITY FLOWS AND CULTURAL REPRODUCTION

Abstract

The article is devoted to the comprehension of the mobility systems of in contemporary world. Mobility is considered to be both real and potential actions in their connection with social relations in space and time. These actions tend to create different kinds of the systems of mobility. So, it considered that, in general, any system of mobility is a complex of social relations and material infrastructure that makes a certain type of movement possible, repeatable and predictable. Mobility systems include not just the actual moving people and objects, but also flows of all kinds of ideas, financial actives or social links, as well as fixed objects of physical infrastructure and everything that provides and supplies them. Any single action or movement is possible only as a part of a certain set of mobility systems and flows, which are being produced by these mobilities systems. Approaches to studying the flows of such scientists as A. Appadurai, J. Urry, M. Castells and some others are analyzed. Attention is paid to the representatives of the actor-network theory B. Latour and J. Law. The existence of such flows is possible only in a globalized world that approached to the high level of technologization. The global movement of information and certain cultural patterns contributes to the formation of a global society and global culture. The article proposes explanations on how flows influence culture in contemporary world. The peculiarities of such influence on high and popular types of culture are distinguished. The contribution of mobility flows in forming cultural tastes is studied. It considered that this contribution tends to spread the patterns of popular culture. The conclusion is made that contemporary global world is interested in the existence of mass culture due to its possibility to convert the types of the capitals in some easy ways. So, modern systems of mobilities contributes to the reproduction of the cultural inequality. The results of the research could be used in further development of the sociology of mobilities and research of the impact of these mobilities on the reproduction of different cultural samples.

Authors and Affiliations

D. E. Russu

Keywords

Related Articles

WORKSHOP SANCTIFIED TO 450TH ANNIVERSARY OF NETHERLANDS REVOLUTION AND 240TH ANNIVERSARY OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION

Scientific conference with participation of Director of Institute of Social Sciences V. Glebov, Chiefs of the Department of International Relations of ISS Î. Brusylovska and the Department of New and Contemporary History...

UKRAINIAN-FRENCH POLITICAL SCIENCE DISCOURSE IN THE MIRROR OF THE «AUDIT OF FOREIGN POLICY OF UKRAINE»

A new phenomenon in Ukrainian political science was the cycle of studies of the Institute of World Policy (Kyiv) «Foreign Policy Audit of Ukraine». The work is supported by several international foundations and organizat...

THE ROLE OF RUSSIA IN THE UKRAINIAN CRISIS OF 2014: DETERRENCE/COERSION ANALYSIS AND PERSPECTIVES

The article analyzes the participation of Russian Federation in the Ukrainian crisis of 2014, as well as the influence of the later at the nuclear deterrence practice. In particular, special attention is dedicated to the...

NEOREALIST THEORY AND ITS PLACE IN THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH

Present article is focused on the evolution of the neorealist theory and its applica¬bility for the international relations and foreign policy research under modern circum¬stances. It is showed in the article that fundam...

PRINCIPLE OF INCLUSION IN GLOBAL POLITICAL PROCESS

The article analyzes one of the three principles of the political strategies formation in the 21st century — the principle of inclusiveness (the desire of the global political process subjects to include into their spher...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP511742
  • DOI 10.18524/2304-1439.2018.1(30).145414
  • Views 73
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

D. E. Russu (2018). MOBILITY FLOWS AND CULTURAL REPRODUCTION. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Соціологія і політичні науки, 23(1), 131-138. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-511742