Modele pozaparlamentarnej kontroli konstytucyjności prawa

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2018, Vol 148, Issue 5

Abstract

The article presents models of extra-parliamentary constitutional review of law. The starting point is the methodological discussion of various concepts of the division and types of review, i.a. political vs judicial, strong vs weak, centralized vs decentralized. Most often the constitutional review of law is classified into American-type review (judicial review) and European-type review (review performed by constitutional courts). This dichotomous classification is often replaced with the categories of “dispersed review” and “concentrated review”, which is the most often classification, at the same time clearly expressing the features distinguishing the two review mechanisms. While the American model does not raise serious discussions, the European model — also referred to as Kelsenian or Austrian model — is controversial. It can be subclassified into original (pure) model and its various mutations, referred to as the mixed European model of the constitutional review of law, most often applied in practice. Moreover, other types of review are also applied in Europe, hence the French and the Scandinavian models are also sometimes distinguished. Regardless of the classification, all review models are now being homogenized. This means that the review is performed by the courts (concrete review is introduced), the protection of rights and freedoms of an individual is emphasized, and poli­tical consequences of constitutional review are becoming more significant, as a result of which the organ performing the constitutional review becomes a political, active authority within the state.

Authors and Affiliations

Jarosław Szymanek

Keywords

Related Articles

Filozofia (teoria) prawa Carla Schmitta?

The main aim of this article is to analyze the small work of Carl Schmitt “On the three types of juristic thought”, fi rst published in 1934. In the literature of the subject, the German scholar is known primarily as a p...

Stany nadzwyczajne w porządku konstytucyjnym Ukrainy — stan wojenny 2018 roku

In this publication, the author analyzes legal norms concerning extraordinary states in the Constitution of Ukraine. The problems are examined based on Ukrainian and foreign constitutional and statutory solutions. In the...

Informacja prawna na temat aktualnego orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie odmowy zastosowania przepisu krajowego, niezgodnego z prawem UE, przez sąd krajowy oraz skutków prawnych skierowania przez sąd krajowy pytania wstępnego do TSUE

The publication contains a review of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union as regards the refusal to apply a provision of the national law by a national court and the legal effects of referring a pre...

Polityka wobec cudzoziemców i polityka azylowa Republiki Federalnej Niemiec

Immigration law in Germany is regulated in some detail the issue of obtaining the right to stay for refugees anticipating any possible irregularities in the process of migration and trying to counteract them. It is not p...

Ekstraterytorialne stosowanie Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności (w kontekście wyrokow Wielkiej Izby ETPC z 7 lipca 2011 r. w sprawach Al-Skeini i inni i Al-Jedda v. Wielka Brytania)

The author discusses the extraterritorial application of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the context of the judgments of the Grand Chamber of the ECHR in cases Al-Skeini et a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP456900
  • DOI 10.31268/PS.2018.20
  • Views 70
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jarosław Szymanek (2018). Modele pozaparlamentarnej kontroli konstytucyjności prawa. PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY, 148(5), 95-116. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-456900