Modeling Subpopulations with the $MIXTURE Subroutine in NONMEM: Finding the Individual Probability of Belonging to a Subpopulation for the Use in Model Analysis and Improved Decision Making

Journal Title: The AAPS Journal - Year 2009, Vol 11, Issue 1

Abstract

In nonlinear mixed effects modeling using NONMEM, mixture models can be used for multimodal distributions of parameters. The fraction of individuals belonging to each of the subpopulations can be estimated, and the most probable subpopulation for each patient is output (MIXESTk). The objective function value (OFV) that is minimized is the sum of the OFVs for each patient (OFVi), which in turn is the sum across the k subpopulations (OFVi,k). The OFVi,k values can be used together with the total probability in the population of belonging to subpopulation k to calculate the individual probability of belonging to the subpopulation (IPk). Our objective was to explore the information gained by using IPk instead of or in addition to MIXESTk in the analysis of mixture models. Two real data sets described previously by mixture models as well as simulations were used to explore the use of IPk and the precision of individual parameter values based on IPk and MIXESTk. For both real data-based mixture models, a substantial fraction (11% and 26%) of the patients had IPk values not close to 0 or 1 (IPk between 0.25 and 0.75). Simulations of eight different scenarios showed that individual parameter estimates based on MIXEST were less precise than those based on IPk, as the root mean squared error was reduced for IPk in all scenarios. A probability estimate such as IPk provides more detailed information about each individual than the discrete MIXESTk. Individual parameter estimates based on IPk should be preferable whenever individual parameter estimates are to be used as study output or for simulations.

Authors and Affiliations

Kristin C. Carlsson, Radojka M. Savi, Andrew C. Hooker, Mats O. Karlsson

Keywords

Related Articles

Issues related to targeted delivery of proteins and peptides

While modern genomic and proteomic technology enables rapid screening of novel proteins and peptides as potential drug candidates, design of delivery systems for these biologics remains challenging especially to achieve...

Population Pharmacodynamic Parameter Estimation from Sparse Sampling: Effect of Sigmoidicity on Parameter Estimates

The objective of this stimulation study was to evaluate effect of simoidicity of the concentration–effect (C–E) relationship on the efficiency of population parameter estimation from sparse sampling and i...

How Minimally Invasive is Microdialysis Sampling? A Cautionary Note for Cytokine Collection in Human Skin and other Clinical Studies

It is common to refer to microdialysis as a minimally invasive procedure, likening it to insertion of an artificial capillary. While a comparison of this type allows the process to be easily visualized by those outside t...

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Mitoxantrone in Mice and Scale-up to Humans: a Semi-Mechanistic Model Incorporating DNA and Protein Binding

We conducted a pharmacokinetic (PK) study of mitoxantrone (Novantrone®), a clinically well-established anticancer agent, in mice and developed a mechanism-based PBPK (physiologically based pharmacokinetic) model...

The therapeutic potential of drugs that target cannabinoid receptors or modulate the tissue levels or actions of endocannabinoids

There are at least 2 types of cannabinoid receptor, CB1 and CB2, both G protein coupled. CB1 receptors are expressed predominantly at nerve terminals and mediate inhibition of transmitter release, whereas CB2 receptors a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP681450
  • DOI  10.1208/s12248-009-9093-4
  • Views 46
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kristin C. Carlsson, Radojka M. Savi, Andrew C. Hooker, Mats O. Karlsson (2009). Modeling Subpopulations with the $MIXTURE Subroutine in NONMEM: Finding the Individual Probability of Belonging to a Subpopulation for the Use in Model Analysis and Improved Decision Making. The AAPS Journal, 11(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-681450