MR ARTIFACTS

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 13

Abstract

BACKGROUND Artifacts in MRI image are produced as a result of various factors related to the machine and the subject undergoing MRI. Artifacts not only affect the quality of images, but also lead to misinterpretation of images by mimicking the pathology. Thus the purpose of this article is to help the radiologist be aware of the most common types of artifacts in day-to-day practice, explain in short the physics related to the appearance of artifact and practical steps to reduce or eliminate the artifacts. Imaging in MRI machine is subjected to various types of artifacts. Artifacts lead to diagnostic dilemma and degradation of the image quality. Hence, it is necessary to understand the type of artifact and measures taken to minimize or eliminate the same. Understanding the artifacts is a three step process, firstly knowing about the type of artifact, secondly cause behind it and thirdly how to decrease or remove the artifacts. MATERIAL AND METHODS Indicated cases for MRI imaging with different protocols and sequences depending upon the need were performed at MAAX super speciality hospital an associated hospital of Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga with GE 1.5T MRI using conventional 2D and 3D Fourier transform sampling methods and performing the standard sequences mentioned in the image. RESULTS Day to day MRI indicated patients were scanned on 1.5 T MRI with different protocols and sequences later on acquiring these images showed varied artifacts these were characterized and classified later proper correction in protocol, sequences, by adding appropriate filters, adjusting the field of view and by counseling eliminating/reducing the artifacts and thus deriving a proper clinical interpretation. CONCLUSION Grouping the artifacts simplifies the understanding of the cause of artifact. The article also describes the nature of the imaging appearance and simple measures required to reduce or correct the artifacts. It will help the radiologist improvise the quality of the images and have a clear difference between pathology and an artifact.

Authors and Affiliations

Shashank G. D, Uma Pandurangi

Keywords

Related Articles

ORBITAL CYSTICERCOSIS MASQUERADING AS INTERNUCLEAR OPHTHALMOPLEGIA

A Muslim lady, 24 year old presented with complaints of headache, orbital pain and right eye adduction deficit mimicking Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia. However absence of diplopia in primary or left gaze made us look for...

SYSTEMATIC GROUPING AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING (AUB) CASES ACCORDING TO FIGO’S PALM-COEIN’S CLASSIFICATION- A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

BACKGROUND There is general inconsistency in the nomenclature used to describe abnormal uterine bleefing(AUB) in addition to a plethora of potential causes, which may coexist in an individual to develop consistent and un...

PROTEIN S DEFICIENCY WITH PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS: A CASE REPORT

Portal vein thrombosis is a rare cause of portal hypertension associated mainly with cirrhosis, thrombophilia and malignancy. In young patient search of risk factor and underlying etiology can change the management and p...

SPECTRUM OF NEONATAL AND INFANTILE INTRACRANIAL ABNORMALITIES USING TRANSCRANIAL NEUROSONOGRAPHY (TCNSG)

BACKGROUND The aim of the study is to evaluate the spectrum of intracranial abnormalities among neonates and infants undergoing transcranial neurosonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS Serial sonographic scans from neonates a...

A STUDY OF BACTERIOLOGICAL PROFILE AND ANTIMICROBIAL SPECTRUM OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCER

BACKGROUND There are various pathophysiological factors, which along with hyperglycaemic state is responsible for diabetic foot ulcer. Out of these, there are three important components, which play important role that is...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP541205
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2018/245
  • Views 85
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Shashank G. D, Uma Pandurangi (2018). MR ARTIFACTS. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 5(13), 1184-1188. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-541205