NARRACJE I STRATEGIE ARGUMENTACYJNE W DYSKURSIE IV RP JAKO NARZĘDZIA WYZNACZANIA GRANIC WSPÓLNOT W POLSKIM SPOŁECZEŃSTWIE

Journal Title: Kultura i Społeczeństwo - Year 2018, Vol 62, Issue 1

Abstract

NARRATIVES AND ARGUMENTATION STRATEGIES IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE 4th REPUBLIC AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR DEMARKING BORDERS IN POLISH SOCIETY This article concerns discourse in the 4th Republic and its role in creating the divisions and cleavages of Polish society. The author analyzes the argumentation strategies used by the press supporting the government and its so-called “good change” (the weeklies Sieci and Uważam Rze, which were published in the years 2012–2017). He concentrates on selected rhetorical practices such as labeling, categorization, and discrimination, and determines that the center of the argumentation strategy of the weeklies analyzed is a discursively constructed division between the “elites” and the “masses” (“ordinary people”). This type of strategy allows the building of a Me-Them dichotomy, which serves not only to strengthen divisions but also to de-legitimize the social space of the 3rd Republic and give legitimacy to the “good change” of the 4th Republic. These activities are exemplified by the manner in which the writers in opinion-forming weeklies describe and explain selected topics and events, such as the Round Table Talks or the migration crisis. The author finds that in the argumentation strategies analyzed, the “nation” is understood as an exclusive community defined from an essentialist perspective. He relates these and other findings to the problem of the new, simplified form of political rivalry and contemporary election campaigns.

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Kotras

Keywords

Related Articles

PROJEKT RADYKALIZACJI REFORMACJI: ULRICHA DUCHROWA TEOLOGICZNA KRYTYKA WSPÓŁCZESNEGO PORZĄDKU SPOŁECZNEGO I POLITYCZNEGO

THE RADICALIZING REFORMATION PROJECT: ULRICH DUCHROW’S THEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ORDER Ulrich Duchrow is one of the most influential contemporary Protestant theologians. He is the lea...

IRLANDZCY TRAWELERZY I STATUS MNIEJSZOŚCI ETNICZNEJ

IRISH TRAVELLERS AND ETHNIC MINORITY STATUS The Irish Travellers, a native, traditionally migratory group, were recently accorded formal recognition in the Republic of Ireland, ending more than three decades of politica...

OD OJCZYZNY PRYWATNEJ DO WIĘZI IDEOLOGICZNEJ ARUMUNI — NARÓD, KTÓREMU NIE JEST POTRZEBNE PAŃSTWO*

FROM PRIVATE HOMELAND TO IDEOLOGICAL TIES: THE AROMANIANS—A PEOPLE WHO DON’T NEED A STATE This article is devoted to the contemporary process of the ethnic mobilizing of stateless European peoples. The Aromanians, who l...

SUBIEKTYWNY WYMIAR UBÓSTWA

THE SUBJECTIVE DIMENSION OF POVERTY This article is devoted to the relational-symbolic dimension of contemporary poverty, which is personified today in homo sacer, that is, the excluded person. Relations between the w...

ETOS DWORU I „LUDZI DOBRZE WYCHOWANYCH”: EPITAFIUM DLA INTELIGENCJI

THE ETHOS OF NOBILITY AND OF WELL-MANNERED PEOPLE: AN EPITAPH FOR POLISH INTELLIGENTSIA The article is devoted to a critical analysis of current controversies concerning the Polish national identity, and the interpretat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP536955
  • DOI -
  • Views 119
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marcin Kotras (2018). NARRACJE I STRATEGIE ARGUMENTACYJNE W DYSKURSIE IV RP JAKO NARZĘDZIA WYZNACZANIA GRANIC WSPÓLNOT W POLSKIM SPOŁECZEŃSTWIE. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 62(1), 141-165. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-536955