Classical autonomic function tests in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers: A comparative study

Journal Title: National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology - Year 2015, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

 Background: The incidence of autonomic dysfunction has increased in the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and various tools have been developed for assessing it. Classical autonomic function tests are one among them. Aims & Objectives: To compare the classical autonomic function tests in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at the PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, on 30 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (cases) and 30 healthy volunteers (controls). Average age of the patients with diabetes mellitus was 48.53 ± 5.12 years (mean ± SD) and that of the volunteers was 47.10 ± 3.59 years (mean ± SD). After obtaining informed, written consent, cardiorespiratory parameters such as resting heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were measured after 10 min of supine rest. Autonomic function parameters such as HR and blood pressure response to handgrip, deep breathing difference test, and Valsalva ratio were recorded in them. Results: Statistical analysis was carried out using independent Student’s t-test, which showed a statistically significant impairment in HR response to handgrip (P < 0.001), blood pressure response to handgrip (P < 0.001), deep breathing test (P < 0.001), and Valsalva ratio (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Results of this study showed that significant impairment was present in patients with type 2 diabetes than in healthy volunteers, and it was more pronounced for parasympathetic system than for sympathetic system.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohan Jayabal, Dinesh Thangavel, Uma Maheswari Thiyagarajan, Nagashree Ramasamy, Venkatesan Rangan, Venkidusamy Subramaniyam

Keywords

Related Articles

Effectiveness of computer-assisted learning as a teaching method in experimental pharmacology

Background: Recently, there has been a progressive reduction in the use of animals for teaching purpose due to ethical consideration. Computer-assisted learning (CAL) is one of the non-animal alternatives in experimental...

Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacovigilance among doctors practicing alternative systems of medicine in Southern India: A questionnaire-based study

Background: Reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an essence of pharmacovigilance practice. Health-care professionals should know how and where to report an ADR. For Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PVPI) to b...

Evaluation of vascular function in depigmented black women: Comparative study

Background: Prolonged application of skin depigmenting substances could expose human organism to serious general complications such as hypertension or diabetes. Artificial depigmentation (AD) is a widespread practice wit...

Heart rate variability by Poincaré plot analysis in patients of essential hypertension and 12-week yoga therapy

Background: Hypertension is one of the psychosomatic disorders prevalent throughout the world. It needs not only medical management but also lifestyle modi fi cation as it is the major contributing factor in the path...

Hardness of tap water samples in Manila City, Philippines through complexometric titration

Background: Water hardness varies depending on the source, treatment procedures, and pipeline conditions among others, though not of immediate concern in water quality control but may have significant health, infrastruct...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP90769
  • DOI 10.5455/njppp.2015.5.160820141
  • Views 111
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohan Jayabal, Dinesh Thangavel, Uma Maheswari Thiyagarajan, Nagashree Ramasamy, Venkatesan Rangan, Venkidusamy Subramaniyam (2015).  Classical autonomic function tests in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers: A comparative study. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 5(1), 68-71. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-90769