COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROUTINE VERSUS RESTRICTED USE OF EPISIOTOMY IN PRIMIGRAVIDAS

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 48

Abstract

 OBJECTIVES To compare maternal morbidity in routine versus selective episiotomy in primigravidae. STUDY DESIGN Prospective case control study. SETTING AND DURATION OF STUDY Obstetrics and gynaecology ward of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad, from November 2013 to June 2015. METHODOLOGY Deliveries managed with routine use of episiotomy formed the Control Group, while those managed with restricted use of episiotomy formed the Study Group. Exclusion Criteria of our study was multigravida, multiple pregnancies, assisted breech deliveries, non-vertex presentations including malposition, instrumental deliveries and associated systemic diseases, maternal exhaustion, preterm deliveries, foetal macrosomia, PROM and VBAC. Perineal Pain Score was measured in the post-partum period by 100 mm VAS (visual analog scale). The main outcome measures which causes maternal morbidity was severe perineal trauma (3rd and 4th degree tears). Other outcomes which cause the maternal morbidity in terms of 1st and 2nd perineal tears, presence of perineal pain, haematoma formation and wound dehiscence were also recorded on proforma. RESULTS This study included 200 patients of routine episiotomy and 200 patients of restricted episiotomy. In the study group, 75% of women had first degree of tear and 22.5% women had second degree tear without any post-partum haemorrhage and in the control group; 95% pregnant women had episiotomy without any extension, 10 pregnant women had third degree of tear. During followup, only 2 patients reported dyspareunia in study group, while 3 patients reported faulty wound healing, 1 patient each reported urinary incontinence and anorectal incontinence, also 4 patients reported dyspareunia among control group. CONCLUSION As perineal pain, perineal tears and wound dehiscence and infections were all less frequent in study group, as compared to routine group, also pelvic muscle strength was better in study group, so overall maternal morbidity was less among study group

Authors and Affiliations

Apurva , Sanjay , Yamini , Rajshree

Keywords

Related Articles

ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERNS IN POST-OPERATIVE INFECTIONS IN ORAL CANCER PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN SOUTH INDIA

BACKGROUND The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in head and neck oncologic surgery has greatly reduced the risk of post-operative wound infection and the corresponding increase in morbidity and health care costs. Aim: To st...

 CLINICO-MORPHOLOGICAL PROFILE IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN WESTERN RAJASTHAN

 BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females. Data on breast cancer profile of patients in Rajasthan, especially Western region is scant. The clinical and morphological presentation may be...

 ARTIFICIAL TEAR SUBSTITUTES: WHICH ONE & WHEN?

 Dry eye is a multi-factorial disease; the therapy should improve the symptoms and signs of dry eye as well as address the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Artificial tear substitutes have been used fo...

ASSOCIATION OF OROFACIAL FEATURES OF β-THALASSEMIA MAJOR PATIENTS

BACKGROUND Patients with β-thalassemia major or Cooley’s anaemia will have severe anaemia, which triggers several defence mechanisms in the body, the most significant of which is the expansion of bone marrow. This expans...

ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT OF A PATIENT WITH SITUS INVERSUS POSTED FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Situs inversus totalis is a congenital visceral malrotation anomaly that results from disturbances in establishment of left-right asymmetry and it is characterized by total transposition of thoracic and abdominal vis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP96303
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2016/718.
  • Views 110
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Apurva, Sanjay, Yamini, Rajshree (2016).  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROUTINE VERSUS RESTRICTED USE OF EPISIOTOMY IN PRIMIGRAVIDAS. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 5(48), 3086-3089. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-96303