COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROUTINE VERSUS RESTRICTED USE OF EPISIOTOMY IN PRIMIGRAVIDAS

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 48

Abstract

 OBJECTIVES To compare maternal morbidity in routine versus selective episiotomy in primigravidae. STUDY DESIGN Prospective case control study. SETTING AND DURATION OF STUDY Obstetrics and gynaecology ward of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad, from November 2013 to June 2015. METHODOLOGY Deliveries managed with routine use of episiotomy formed the Control Group, while those managed with restricted use of episiotomy formed the Study Group. Exclusion Criteria of our study was multigravida, multiple pregnancies, assisted breech deliveries, non-vertex presentations including malposition, instrumental deliveries and associated systemic diseases, maternal exhaustion, preterm deliveries, foetal macrosomia, PROM and VBAC. Perineal Pain Score was measured in the post-partum period by 100 mm VAS (visual analog scale). The main outcome measures which causes maternal morbidity was severe perineal trauma (3rd and 4th degree tears). Other outcomes which cause the maternal morbidity in terms of 1st and 2nd perineal tears, presence of perineal pain, haematoma formation and wound dehiscence were also recorded on proforma. RESULTS This study included 200 patients of routine episiotomy and 200 patients of restricted episiotomy. In the study group, 75% of women had first degree of tear and 22.5% women had second degree tear without any post-partum haemorrhage and in the control group; 95% pregnant women had episiotomy without any extension, 10 pregnant women had third degree of tear. During followup, only 2 patients reported dyspareunia in study group, while 3 patients reported faulty wound healing, 1 patient each reported urinary incontinence and anorectal incontinence, also 4 patients reported dyspareunia among control group. CONCLUSION As perineal pain, perineal tears and wound dehiscence and infections were all less frequent in study group, as compared to routine group, also pelvic muscle strength was better in study group, so overall maternal morbidity was less among study group

Authors and Affiliations

Apurva , Sanjay , Yamini , Rajshree

Keywords

Related Articles

OCCURRENCE AND OUTCOME OF OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTIONS AMONG HAART EXPERIENCED PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF KOLKATA

BACKGROUND There were about 21 lakh people living with HIV in India and number of new cases was 86,000 in 2015 as reported by UNAIDS in 2015. The scenario here is a bit different than the western population due to the di...

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC AND ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS- A HOSPITAL-BASED STUDY

BACKGROUND Left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, so its early detection is of major importance for initiation of treatment and its reversal by certain a...

ALLERGIES IN INDIA- A STUDY OF 6270 PATIENTS

BACKGROUND Allergies afflict a large population of the world. Previous studies have revealed that the incidence of allergic manifestations and causative allergens in India are different from the western countries. MATERI...

URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN PREGNANCY

BACKGROUND Urinary tract infection in pregnancy is one of the most common bacterial infections, which if not treated can cause serious harm to both mother and foetus. A woman is predisposed to urinary tract infection bec...

RISK EFFECT OF MATERNAL NUTRITION ON BIRTH WEIGHT OF BABY- A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

BACKGROUND Low birth weight of the baby is associated with increased incidence of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The present study is aimed at assessing the effect of maternal nutritional status during pregnancy on we...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP96303
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2016/718.
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Apurva, Sanjay, Yamini, Rajshree (2016).  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROUTINE VERSUS RESTRICTED USE OF EPISIOTOMY IN PRIMIGRAVIDAS. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 5(48), 3086-3089. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-96303