RADIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF TWO GROUPS OF ANCHORS IN DOUBLE-ROW ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 64

Abstract

 OBJECTIVE Rotator cuff tears are a common shoulder problem and recently double-row repair techniques have shown superior biomechanical advantages when compared to single-row constructs in a properly selected patient. This study compared 2.8 mm and 4.5 mm anchors with respect to clinical and radiological outcome in two groups of patients. Of course, for the same number of 4.5 anchors used. Volume of Bone Replaced (VBR) will be far less if 2.8 anchors are used in equal number. But, in such surgeries, the ultimate objective was to restore the anatomic footprint and the number of anchors used varied accordingly. MATERIAL AND METHODS 50 patients of rotator cuff tear (Size >3 cm) were treated with double-row method of repair arthroscopically. In 25 patients, 2.8 mm anchors were used and in rest 25 patients 4.5 mm anchors were used. Operated patients underwent CT scan of the shoulder during followup period. Using computer software (OsiriX), the cylindrical bone defects made for the anchors were measured by using the formula for volume of the cylinder. For every case, total Volume of Bone Replaced (VBR) was calculated. Since the plane of the anchor cannot always be sagittal or coronal, hence using MPR (Multiplanar reconstruction) tool in OsiriX, a plane was selected in which length of the anchor is the largest meaning that it is the plane parallel to true long axis of the anchor. Radius of the cylinder was calculated in a plane 90 degree to the previously defined plane. RESULTS Comparing the two groups, we didn’t find any significant difference in the clinical outcome. However, there was a significant difference in one radiological parameter-Volume of Bone Replaced (VBR). CONCLUSION There was no difference in clinical recovery in the two groups. However, Volume of Bone Replaced (VBR) was more in 4.5 mm anchor group when compared to 2.8 mm anchor group. This finding can be important to a surgeon when he is operating a re-tear in an already operated double-row patient since there will be a relatively more bone stock available for the surgeon to place additional anchors.

Authors and Affiliations

Ojas , Rajendra , Umesh Meena, Tejas , Vishal

Keywords

Related Articles

RUPTURED LIVER ABSCESS: AN UNUSUAL CAUSE OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM

Pneumoperitoneum is a common presentation in surgical practice which is taken to be pathognomonic of hollow viscus perforation. Other lesions may also present as pneumoperitoneum. We present a case where a lady prese...

 ANATOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY

 [b]AIMS[/b]: The knowledge of normal and variant anatomy of subclavian artery in terms of its origin, dimensions, course and relations is mandatory in various diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures....

ANALYSIS OF FIBREOPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY STUDIES AT A TERTIARY HEALTH CARE CENTER IN MALWA REGION

Bronchoscopy is an invasive test done with intention of diagnosing and treating complex pulmonary diseases. As a tertiary referral center in central India we received several such cases and analyzed 200 Bronchoscopy...

ADHERENCE TO TREATMENT AMONG TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS ATTENDING TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN AGARTALA CITY- A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

BACKGROUND Poor adherence or non-adherence is a great problem in the control of diabetes mellitus type 2. Despite the advances in the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 over the years, diabetes remains as a burden on...

 ROLE OF ULTRASOUND IN EVALUATION OF RETROPERITONEAL LESIONS

 BACKGROUND The retroperitoneum contains the adrenals, kidneys and ureters, the duodenal loop, pancreas, great vessels with their branches and associated lymph node chains, ascending and descending portions of th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP149446
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2016/1033
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ojas, Rajendra, Umesh Meena, Tejas, Vishal (2016).  RADIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF TWO GROUPS OF ANCHORS IN DOUBLE-ROW ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 5(64), 4524-4527. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-149446