Why we always go back to Darwin?
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2011, Vol 3, Issue 1
Abstract
Mircea Flonta, Darwin şi după Darwin. Studii de filozofie a biologiei [Darwin et après Darwin. Études de philosophie de la biologie], Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2010
Authors and Affiliations
Ciprian Jeler
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP86228
- DOI -
- Views 165
- Downloads 0
L’influence de Maine de Biran dans le dépassement par Patočka de la chair merleau-pontienne
In this paper, I examine the sense of being of the subject which is at the same time in the world (ontological univocity) and the medium of its appearing (ontological equivocality). An existential analysis of the intramu...
Pratiques de la ville et inconscient urbain : déplacements de l’utopie dans le discours critique de l’urbanisme
This article tackles the critical approaches to urbanism as power-knowledge developed since the 1960-1970 based on the instruments of semiological and psychoanalytical analysis. From this viewpoint, we come back to the c...
Being born from the world and being born to the world: Merleau-Ponty / Patočka
The phenomenon of birth is here to be presented as a crucial one, discreet though, into Merleau-Ponty and Patočka’s philosophy. So it deserves a confrontation of their respective thoughts. Both of them have radicalised H...
La douleur comme « matrice » de la vie intérieure chez Nietzsche
This paper attempts to put some order among the different notions of pain that are to be found in the Nietzschean philosophical corpus. It tries to show that there is a mutation of the Nietzschean concept of pain, from t...
Value and the phenomenology of situation in the works of Heidegger
Value and the phenomenology of situation in the works of Heidegger