NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE NEO-CONSTITUTIONALISM
Journal Title: Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho - Year 2014, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
The term “neoconstitucionalism” is quite ambiguous: contemporary culture uses it to denote such as heterogeneous things as a form of state, a policy of judicial activism, a theoretical account of contemporary legal systems, a kind of legal methodology, and ideological adherence to the law. This paper focuses on the aspects related to judicial policy, legal theory and legal methodology, by emphasizing two possible perspectives. The first one called negative, that delineates such a prismatic conception of law as a set of oppositions to the theses defended by predominant legal theories. The second one is dubbed positive, since it claims to having identified a whole series of “new discoveries” about contemporary legal systems. The positive version is characterized by eight points: (1) the law of constitutional state is a combination of rules and principles, (2) rules and principles are liable to bring about a systematic set of norms, (3) contemporary constitutions incorporate moral values, so that they have created a relevant connection between law and morality, (4) the incorporation of moral values in the constitution means that the interpreters must construe the constitutional provisions by a moral reading, (5) any legal norm is defeasable, (6) some legal standards require balancing, as opposed to traditional subsuntive reasoning, (7) by holistically interpreting legal provisions, judges can decide any dispute whatsoever, (8) legal norms cannot have any content, since their content is eventually determined by moral judgments. The paper winds up illustrating some of the achievements and the shortcomings of each kind of neoconstitutionalism.
Authors and Affiliations
Giovanni Battista Ratti
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP36071
- DOI https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v4i0.75
- Views 403
- Downloads 0
PLANNED DIFFERENCES: ARGENTINA’S UNIVERSAL CHILD ALLOWANCE FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE
This article intends to analyze Universal Child Allowance (UCA)—a large-scale conditional cash transfer (CCT) program in Argentina—from a human rights and constitutional perspective. Conditions required in the UCA system...
RAZÓN Y DEMOCRACIA: LA POTENCIAL RENOVACIÓN DEL CONCEPTO DE ARISTOCRACIA
This article studies the relationship between different kinds of discussion and the roles that they play in the diverse institutions of modern representative democracy. It distinguishes between three kinds of discussion:...
PERSON: THE REASON OF LAW
All law is intended to achieve the common good. Within this institutional framework, justice is the supreme value that seeks to ensure the competent authority. When is it possible to say that it is acting according to ju...
NULLITY AND INEXISTENCE OF LEGAL ACTS IN ECUADORIAN LAW
Inexistence and nullity of juridical acts are basic institutions in Ecuadorian Law. These are two different categories that have in common the chasing of the invalidity of the juridical acts that didn’t form according to...
THE RELATION BETWEEN MORALITY AND LAW IN “PALEOPOSITIVISM” AND IUS POSITIVISM. CONTRIBUTIONS TO A CHRONICLE
In this paper, a historical chronicle of relations between morality and law´s done, as they have been conceived by legal positivists, since Austin´s developments until Hart´s propositions; most of them have been put fort...