Neurobiology and free will: a dialogue between Mariano Artigas and John Eccles
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
In this article, I discuss the importance of multidisciplinary research to tackle the questions that empirical sciences, and in particular neuroscience, ultimately encounter. The last decades have witnessed an enormous progress in brain research, mainly because of the improvement of neuroimaging techniques and neurogenetics, and the development of optogenetics. Furthermore, the US Government and European Union have launched the BRAIN Initiative and Human Brain Project, respectively, to promote a better understanding of brain functioning and its disorders. Unfortunately, their gates appear sealed for disciplines that pursue a deep knowledge of the mind, such as philosophy or psychology. The most probable outcome of this situation is “promissory materialism”, as Sir John Eccles warned several decades ago. I review the multidisciplinary approach of Eccles to the study of the brain and mind, especially through his relationship with Mariano Artigas. Finally, I propose that interdisciplinary research may be improved by a more solid understanding of the discipline one wants to dialogue with, and a multidisciplinary training from the beginning of the research career.
Authors and Affiliations
Javier Bernácer
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP198913
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2016.038
- Views 90
- Downloads 0
Oracles, Prophets and the Exoteric Circles of Science and Religion
Drawing upon Karl Giberson and Mariano Artigas’ joint book The Oracles of Science, I discuss the limits of an emphasis on so-called philosophical bridges in the relationship between science and religion. Epistemological...
Brain based criteria for death in the light of the Aristotelian-Scholastic anthropology
In 1968 the authors of the so-called Harvard Report, proposed the recognition of an irreversible coma as a new criterion for death. The proposal was accepted by the medical, legal, religious and political circles in spit...
La crítica de Juan de santo Tomás del concepto suareciano de materia prima
The John of Saint Thomas' critique of the suarecian concept of the prime matter The figure of Juan Poinsot (Juan de Santo Tomás, Joannis a Santo Thoma) is inserted in the movement of return to a Thomism free of nominali...
Why minds cannot be received, but are created by brains
There is no controversy in psychology or brain sciences that brains create mind and consciousness. Doubts and opinions to the contrary are quite frequently expressed in non-scientific publications. In particular the idea...
After Suárez: Physical and Intentional Causality in the 17th-18th Centuries Scholasticism
The article investigates the distinction between the physical and the intentional causality that appeared in the 17th century scholasticism in the course of polemics with the traditional Aristotelian classification of ca...