Obiecte și interpretări. În legătură cu „mesajul” fibulelor „hibride”
Journal Title: MATERIALE SI CERCETARI ARHEOLOGICE - Year 2016, Vol 0, Issue 0
Abstract
The following discussion resumes a recurring theme chiefly in the Romanian and Bulgarian archaeology of the last decades, namely the issues related to the so‐called "hybrid” fibulae. Recent studies referring to this topic tried to clarify the typology and chronology of the previous definition(s) – rather unclear – of these pieces, and the “frontier” towards Thracian scheme fibulae or La Tène scheme fibulae. The "hybrid” fibulae diversity, their relatively small number and rather unique feature than clear or proper typological series – which combine elements derived from the two mentioned schemes –, place them rather in a "family" of copies than within a well enough defined "type". From the chronological perspective, they are to be situated (with a better probability, but still with some reserve) towards the ending production period of the Thracian fibulae that is by the end of the first half of the 3rd century BC. La discussion qui s’ensuit reprend un thème récurrent surtout dans l’archéologie roumaine et bulgare des dernières décennies, à savoir la question des soi‐disant fibules « hybrides ». Quelques études de date récente concernant ce thème ont essayé de préciser en tant que typologie et chronologie la définition antérieure, relativement incertaine, de ces pièces‐là et la « frontière » par rapport aux fibules de « schéma thracique » ou La Tène. La diversité des fibules « hybrides », leur nombre relativement faible et leur caractère à peu près singulier – plutôt unique –, mais qui mélange des éléments dérivés des deux schémas mentionnés, peut les situer plutôt dans une « famille » d’exemplaires que dans les « limites » d’un « type » suffisamment bien précisé. Quant à leur position chronologique elles sont à être situées (avec une meilleure probabilité, et avec une certaine réserve à la fois) vers la période de fin de la production des fibules thraciques, c’est‐à‐dire vers la fin de la première moitié du IIIe siècle av. J.‐C.
Authors and Affiliations
Vlad Vintilă Zirra
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP463478
- DOI -
- Views 54
- Downloads 0
Industria materiilor dure animale din situl mezolitic de la Alibeg (jud. Caraș‐Severin)
The bone, antler and tusk assemblage from the Mesolithic site at Alibeg (Caraș‐Severin County) The Mesolithic settlements in the Iron Gates have yielded rich assemblages of antler, bone and Sus scrofa canines, exemplifie...
Un complex funerar medieval descoperit la Șibot (jud. Alba). Date arheologice și antropologice/ A medieval funerary complex discovered at Şibot (Alba County). Archaeological and anthropological data
The site of Şibot (Alba County) was investigated in 2012 and over 300 archaeological features were exposed. The excavations confirmed the presence of a medieval settlement dating to the 15th century and destroyed during...
Despre obiceiurile funerare ale nomazilor timpurii din stepele est‐europene (sec. X–VIII î.Hr.) / On the burial customs of the early nomads from the east‐European steppes (10th–8th century BC)
This article proposes an ordering of the information regarding funerary practices in the Eastern European steppe in the Early Iron Age (10th–8th centuries BC), as well as a study of their territorial distribution. Tradit...
Review of Alin Frînculeasa, Angela Simalcsik, Bianca Preda, Daniel Garvăn, Smeeni – Movila Mare. Monografia unui sit arheologic regăsit, Biblioteca Mousaios 13, Editura Cetatea de Scaun, Târgovişte, 2017, 381 p., 35 fig., 136 pl.
review of the monography dedicated to the Smeeni-Movila Mare, Buzău Contry, Romania
Descoperiri monetare la Histria – Sectorul Sud (2013–2017) / Monetary discoveries at Histria – South Sector (2013–2017)
During the 2013–2017 systematic research undertaken in the South Sector of the archaeological site Histria, 85 coins were collected, out of which 68 pieces (80%) were identified. The excavations have been focused on the...