Abstract

In the study carried out is analyzed legal object of the offence provided to art.278 PC RM. It has been identified the generic and special legal object. It has been shown that public security is the fundamental social value suffered by committing terrorist acts. It has been argued that by committing terrorist acts is violated the rights and interests of a group of people, as a rule, indefinitely, not one person. It has been demonstrated that the offenses provided to art.278 PC RM violates in the main plan on social relations which are organic bypass with public security, but not with state security or with international security (humanity). In the case of the terrorist act provided in paragraph (1) art.278 PC RM (except when the harmful act is expressed in threat with terrorist act) only one of the secondary social values is binding. Others social values are optional. In the case of the offense provided in paragraph (1) art.278 CP RM when the harmful act is expressed in threat with terrorist act the secondary legal object is not an alternative. It is unique (the social relations regarding the person’s psychic freedom), but it is also mandatory.

Authors and Affiliations