Obrońca wobec opinii biegłego w procesie karnym
Journal Title: Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały - Year 2015, Vol 16, Issue 1
Abstract
In accordance with the binding criminal procedure, the defender may request that an expert witness is called to court by addressing an appropriate motion to a judicial body (the prosecutor or the court). Th e body may consider the motion but is not obliged to do so. Once the witness has been called to court, he or she can be questioned, and his or her expertise and/or impartiality can be examined. Demanding the appointment of a different expert witness is also an option once circumstances that allow or require the exclusion of the previous one have occurred. A motion to appoint another expert witness before the court can be made, yet only if it has been proved that the current expert opinion has been incomplete or unclear, internally contradictory, or contradictory to other opinions issued in the same case. An expert witness may be called to court only by a judicial body. Th e defender has no right to the appointment of his or her own expert witness. Th e most recent revision of the Code of Criminal Procedure (KPK), whose goal was to increase the degree of fairness of trials, still does not envisage the option to have expert witnesses called to court by the defence. Th e court and prosecutor will continue to have a monopoly on the appointment of expert witnesses. Th e defence can only provide ‘a private opinion’ issued at its behest. Th is cannot, however, have the status of an expert opinion (with all the due consequences) but only the status of a private statement that may be read out at the trail but cannot be confronted with an expert witness opinion.
Authors and Affiliations
Jan Widacki
Charakter prawny wyroku sądu cywilnego stwierdzającego nieważność uchwały sprzecznej z ustawą podjętej przez wspólników sp. z o.o. lub walne zgromadzenie akcjonariuszy spółki akcyjnej oraz rodzaj wadliwości, którą objęta jest taka uchwała
...
Drobna przestępczość – problematyka zjawiska
Domestic criminal legistation consistently applies the idea of dualism of crimes dividing them into felonies and misdemeanors. Th is demarcation has in mind primrily the gravity of the off enses. Th e bifurcation is most...
Konsekwencje wykorzystywania informacji poufnych w obrocie giełdowym w teorii i praktyce na przykładzie USA oraz Chin
Lawyers writing about insider trading often reproduce the assumption that this phenomenon prevents the development of the stock exchange. The author takes on the workshop the assumption, whether the stock market actually...
Problematyka odpowiedzialności partnerów za zobowiązania w spółce partnerskiej
The premise of the article is the analysis the principles of liability of a partner for debts of a professional partnership into the Polish legal system, compared to American and German regulations. Moreover, this articl...
Zastosowanie probabilistyki w analizie zakresu zastosowania normy prawnej. Wstęp do dalszej dyskusji
The paper shows general concept of use of probability theory methods in analysis of legal norm application scope understood as class of events to which given legal norm is applicable. Proposed solution assumes that appli...