Obrońca wobec opinii biegłego w procesie karnym

Journal Title: Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały - Year 2015, Vol 16, Issue 1

Abstract

In accordance with the binding criminal procedure, the defender may request that an expert witness is called to court by addressing an appropriate motion to a judicial body (the prosecutor or the court). Th e body may consider the motion but is not obliged to do so. Once the witness has been called to court, he or she can be questioned, and his or her expertise and/or impartiality can be examined. Demanding the appointment of a different expert witness is also an option once circumstances that allow or require the exclusion of the previous one have occurred. A motion to appoint another expert witness before the court can be made, yet only if it has been proved that the current expert opinion has been incomplete or unclear, internally contradictory, or contradictory to other opinions issued in the same case. An expert witness may be called to court only by a judicial body. Th e defender has no right to the appointment of his or her own expert witness. Th e most recent revision of the Code of Criminal Procedure (KPK), whose goal was to increase the degree of fairness of trials, still does not envisage the option to have expert witnesses called to court by the defence. Th e court and prosecutor will continue to have a monopoly on the appointment of expert witnesses. Th e defence can only provide ‘a private opinion’ issued at its behest. Th is cannot, however, have the status of an expert opinion (with all the due consequences) but only the status of a private statement that may be read out at the trail but cannot be confronted with an expert witness opinion.

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Widacki

Keywords

Related Articles

Zasada in dubio pro tributario jako gwarancja stabilności prawa podatkowego

The article contains the creation and formation origins of resolving the tax doubts in favor of the taxpayers. We can find numerous examples, which confirm the importance of the in dubio pro tributario tax law rule. The...

R. Strugała, Standardowe klauzule umowne adaptacyjne, salwatoryjne, merger, interpretacyjne oraz pactum de forma [Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2013]

Recenzja publikacji R. Strugała, Standardowe klauzule umowne adaptacyjne, salwatoryjne, merger, interpretacyjne oraz pactum de forma [Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2013]

Przestępstwo i kara w fi lozoficznym ujęciu Johna Finnisa

The main aim of this article is to outline the concept of criminal responsibility emerging from John Finnis’s natural law philosophy. Finnis accepts the retrospective point of view of punishment (retribution), rejecting...

Z historii ksiąg gruntowych (Grundbücher)

In the article the Author makes an attempt to describe – in a broad historical perspective – the genesis and evolution of the German system of “ground book” (Grundbuch) as an instrument of registration of interests to la...

Penalizacja bezprawnego przekroczenia granicy państwowej

Przedmiotem rozważań są uregulowania polskiego systemu prawnego, odnoszące się do problemu bezprawnego przekroczenia granicy państwowej. Autorka przedstawiła rys historyczny przepisów dotyczących nielegalnego przekroczen...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP192748
  • DOI -
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jan Widacki (2015). Obrońca wobec opinii biegłego w procesie karnym. Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały, 16(1), 5-20. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-192748