Ocular response analyzer (ORA) derived parameters compared to Sirius corneal topography in analyzing corneal pathology

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 3

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the ability of Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) to differentiate between normal and abnormal corneas as compared to Sirius corneal topography. Methods: This retrospective study included 302 eyes of 151 patients. All patients underwent evaluation with ORA and Sirius corneal topography. Parameters included disease classification results on both instruments (device software classification), Surface asymmetry index (SAI) on Sirius, Corneal Hysteresis (CH), Corneal Resistant Factor (CRF), Keratoconus Match Index (KMI), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), Corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and waveform score (WS) on ORA. Results: On Sirius, 198 eyes (65.6%) were classified as normal. On ORA, 121 eyes (40.1%) were documented as normal. Overall, 105 eyes (34.8%) were classified as normal and 88 eyes (29.1%) with non-normal classification on both Sirius and ORA. Of the 198 eyes classified as normal on Sirius, 53% were classified as normal, 39% as suspect and 8% as mild keratoconus on ORA (47% non-normal). Of the 121 eyes classified as normal on ORA, 87% were classified as normal, 6% as suspect, and 2% as keratoconus compatible on Sirius (13% non-normal). Four percent of the eyes classified as keratoconus compatible on Sirius were classified as normal on ORA. There was a significant difference when comparing normal and non-normal classifications between ORA and Sirius (p < 0.001) with poor agreement (Kappa=0.32). When including only normal and Keratoconus eyes in the analysis, good agreement was found between the two machines (Kappa=0.75). Conclusion: According to our results there seems to be a significant difference between ORA and Sirius in their ability to differentiate between normal and non-normal eyes. As such, we recommend that these devices not to be used interchangeably for assessing patients prior to refractive surgery.

Authors and Affiliations

Tania Ayad Baban, Fady Kamal Sammouh, Haitham Muhidine El Ballouz, Elias Lutfalla Warrak

Keywords

Related Articles

Self perceived ocular morbidities among geriatric subjects of urban Varanasi

Introduction: Older population is at higher risk of ocular problems. One of the significant reasons for this phenomenon could be ageing which leads to degenerative changes. With this background this study was conducted o...

Comparative study of use of pharmacological agents vs mechanical stretching techniques in management of small pupil in manual small incision cataract surgery

Purpose: Manual SICS requires a well-dilated pupil for nuclear management. Cataract with small pupil causes problems during nuclear management and Capsolorrhexis. In this study we share our own experience of using pharma...

Study of early refractive changes following Nd: YAG capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification in pseudophakia

Abstract Purpose: To study the effect of capsulotomy size on refraction and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Methods: Thirty five patients were examined pre procedure and 3 days after Nd: YAG capsulotomy. Patients we...

Biomarkers of Primary open- angle glaucoma

t is my humble privilege to present the special issue of IJCEO after successful journey of two years. This issue of IJCEO has several interesting articles on vision threatening morbidity , Glaucoma particularly on diagno...

Clinical indications of penetrating keratoplasty in Punjab

Purpose: To study the indications for penetrating keratoplasty(PKP) in Punjab. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who underwent PKP at Sri Guru Ram Das Institute o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP241207
  • DOI -
  • Views 132
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tania Ayad Baban, Fady Kamal Sammouh, Haitham Muhidine El Ballouz, Elias Lutfalla Warrak (2016). Ocular response analyzer (ORA) derived parameters compared to Sirius corneal topography in analyzing corneal pathology. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2(3), 169-173. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-241207