Odpowiedzialność karna za przestępne współdziałanie w prawie angielskim po wyroku R v. Jogee; Ruddock v. The Queen

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2018, Vol 76, Issue

Abstract

The combined decisions of the UK Supreme Court and Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in R v. Jogee; Ruddock v. The Queen caused upheaval in the English law on criminal complicity. The Supreme Court/Privy Council decided that the law on criminal complicity „took a wrong turn” 33 years ago in the Privy Council ruling in Chan Wing-Siu which concerned a controversial doctrine of parasitic joint enterprise liability. According to the said doctrine, if A and B set out to commit a crime X (e.g. robbery) and B foresees that A might commit crime Y (e.g. murder) in the course of committing crime X, B will be liable for crime Y, even if he does not intend that crime Y be committed. The mere fact of foresight on B’s part is enough for him to be criminally liable. Decision in Jogee; Ruddock is of seminal importance as it overturned the doctrine of parasitic joint enterprise liability. It is doubtful, however, to what extent the Supreme Court has resolved the problems that have bedeviled this area of law. This article presents in outline the English law on criminal complicity and attempts to assess the changes that were introduced in Jogee; Ruddock. A number of issues still call for further refinement and resolution. It appears, however, that the emphasis the Supreme Court put on intention as a required standard of fault, draws, at least superficially, the continental (Polish and German) and English criminal law closer together in terms of mens rea requirements for secondary liability.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Brzostek

Keywords

Related Articles

Instytucja rozszerzonego przepadku mienia w Republice Włoskiej a rozwiązania polskie

The article analyses the institiution of extended confiscation in the Italian Republic where such solution has been functioning for over twenty years, depriving criminal organisatuions of assets worth hundreds of milions...

10 years of the Polish Act on Lobbying Activity – 10 Years of Disappointments

The aim of this paper is to present the main solutions adopted in Polish act of July 7, 2005 on lobbying activity in the law-making process, with particular emphasis on the dysfunctions of this regulation. Despite the ho...

Procesowa reprezentacja Skarbu Państwa a reprezentacja materialnoprawna

So far, the legal representation of the State Treasury has raised serious doubts in Polish law. They were eliminated by the Act of 16 December 2016 on the principles of state property management. It aligned the provision...

Instrumenty wsparcia bezpośredniego dla rolnictwa po 2020 r.

The aim of this study is to present the instruments of direct support after 2020. The article presents the history of direct payments since their establishment in 1992 to today’s model of direct support that agricultural...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP436247
  • DOI -
  • Views 94
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Piotr Brzostek (2018). Odpowiedzialność karna za przestępne współdziałanie w prawie angielskim po wyroku R v. Jogee; Ruddock v. The Queen. Studia Iuridica, 76(), 98-121. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-436247