On archaeological definition of ethnic group: continued

Journal Title: Поволжская Археология - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 14

Abstract

The author aimed to examine the core matter of the discussion, which has been going for a while in academic publications and numerous conferences in the Volga-Ural region. This discussion concerns the Ugrian presence in the Kama and Cis-Ural region in early Middle Ages. Particularly, its participants questioned the correctness of statistical analysis of archaeological materials conducted by V.A. Ivanov. In view of the criticisms and using corrected data of statistical analysis of the funerary rite practiced by the Kama and Cis-Ural archaeological cultures in the second half of I Millennium AD and their synchronous cultures in the forest zones of Trans-Ural and Western Siberia and Hungarian burial grounds of the Arpad period in the Danube area, V.A. Ivanov conducted a new analysis but arrived at the same conclusion, i.e. that all of these cultures are the same ethnic-cultural area, typologically connected with the archaeological culture of the ancient Hungarians. Further, V.A. Ivanov propose to abandon ethnic reconstruction, for a while, and to explain this phenomenon. It appears that in this case we face much more important and principal issues: methodology of ethnic definitions based on archaeological data, correlation of archaeology and its specific methods with methods of other branches, as well as jurisdiction of archaeology. In this regard, it is noted that none statistical methods are able to elevate archaeological data to ethnic-linguistic reconstructions. It is necessary to distinguish two separate problems here: the statistical similarity between signs of archaeological cultures and their linguistic characteristics. It is methodologically incorrect to mix these two different approaches.

Authors and Affiliations

Iskander Izmailov

Keywords

Related Articles

Leather Footwear from the Posad of Sviyazhsk: an Experience of Reconstrucion of Simple Porshni

The authors use simple porshni (one-piece leather-hide shoes) from Sviyazhsk to test an approach to systemic classification of the late medieval leather footwear. They describe the main stages in restoration and reconstr...

Bolgar Saltpeter Plant in Historical, Archival and Cartographic Materials

The article features a collection and analysis of all known historiographical information concerning the operation of the Bolgar saltpeter plant in the territory of Bolgar fortified settlement in the Spassky district of...

Artifacts with General Non-Utilitarian Wear Traces in the Assemblage of the Eneolithic Flint Workshop Ugdym Ib (The Middle Vychegda, Republic of Komi)

The paper reports results of a study of four previously undescribed artifacts, which came from a cache with general non-utilitarian microwear traces. It describes the method of their detection and recognition in the arch...

Ust’-Nechkinskiy fortified settlements in the Middle Kama region during the Ananyino culture (topography, layout, inventory)

The article focuses on materials of new excavations on an early Iron Age site that has been known since 19th century in the Udmurt Kama River region, which still remains a mystery to the experts. The site has not a typic...

Methodological Aspects of Studying Fortifications of Hillforts in the Volga-Kama Region of the Early Iron – Early Middle Ages

The paper considers the methodological aspects of comprehensive archaeological and geological-geomorphological studies of fortifications dating back to the Early Iron Age – Early Middle Ages. The authors determined that...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP172862
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2015.4.14.220.234
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Iskander Izmailov (2015). On archaeological definition of ethnic group: continued. Поволжская Археология, 4(14), 220-234. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-172862