On ways of improving national criminal procedure law in the fight against terrorism

Journal Title: Проблеми законності - Year 2016, Vol 135, Issue 135

Abstract

The article analyzes certain provisions of the criminal procedure law regarding preventive measures to the subjects, reasonably suspected of committing crimes against national security and public safety. The study concludes that the situation in which the person is reasonably suspected of having committed one of the worst category of crimes – against national security and public safety, it is difficult to apply the preventive measure is unacceptable. After investigators and prosecutors is problematic as part of the pre-trial investigation to collect, given the objective circumstances (commission of an offense in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine) a sufficient amount of material (evidence) that might argue the need to apply suspect this exclusive preventive measures as detention custody.In order to eliminate preconditions to avoid persons involved in the commission of crimes against national security, criminal liability due to excessive democratization of national criminal and criminal procedural law, we consider it appropriate to amend the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, which provide for the applicability of the person suspected of committing illegal acts above categories, all precautions set forth in Code of Ukraine provided the objective reasons at the time of announcement of suspicion cannot collect enough hard evidence to substantiate in court to elect a preventive measure in the form of detention (investigator in agreement with the prosecutor will act on petition the court to apply to suspect another preventive measure provided for in art. 176 Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine). Another area outlined solving problematic issues can serve to simplify the legislative mechanism of a preventive measure in the form of detention for this category of offenders.

Authors and Affiliations

Роман Черниш

Keywords

Related Articles

О правовом регулировании животноводства в Украине

Анализ правового регулирования животноводства в Украине доказал, что существующие нормативные предписания урегулируют разнообразные виды общественных отношений, поскольку они касаются как функционирования целых подотрасл...

Преюдиционный запрос как инструмент обеспечения единства судебной практики: сущность и механизмы введения в гражданское судопроизводство

Рассматриваются вопросы введения института преюдиционного запроса в национальную систему гражданского судопроизводства. Раскрыта сущность преюдиционного запроса, а также его значение для обеспечения единства судебной пра...

Морально-психологічні ознаки злочинця-іммігранта в Україні

На основі результатів емпіричного дослідження та анкетування працівників правоохоронних органів дано характеристику морально-психологічних ознак особистості злочинця-іноземця та злочинця-апатрида. Особливу увагу приділен...

Some of the determination of guilt as a mandatory feature of the subjective side of separatism

The article is devoted to the study of the subjective side of the crime. Existing positions in the science of criminal law concerning this element of the crime were studied. The article used the most accurate definitions...

Higher legal education: problematic aspects determining the content of concept in current legislation

Higher legal education is a necessary component of the legal profession, a guarantee of professional competence of the lawyer. It plays an important role in social development, the environment for the formation of lawyer...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP173558
  • DOI 10.21564/2414-990x.135.83751
  • Views 95
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Роман Черниш (2016). On ways of improving national criminal procedure law in the fight against terrorism. Проблеми законності, 135(135), 196-203. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-173558