Optimal portfolios vis-à-vis corporate governance ratings: some UK evidence

Journal Title: Economic Annals-XXI - Year 2018, Vol 170, Issue 3

Abstract

Socially responsible investments may offer investors higher returns because of the perceived lower risk and thus associated cost (monitoring, litigation, etc.), although it might also be less profitable as posited by proponents of the Efficient Market Hypothesis where higher risk is compensated with higher returns. Corporate governance (CG) - one of the key components in socially responsible investing - has been extensively studied for evaluating its relationship with firm performance. In this paper, we extend prior literature by exploring the investment performances of two distinct portfolios built using strong versus weak corporate governance firms. We contribute by investigating the value of corporate governance (or lack thereof) in formulating portfolios. Using London Stock Exchange data for the period January 2012 through June 2018 and both ends of the quartile spectrum from 2017 Good Governance Report, we optimize each portfolio based on their Sharpe criterion. Our findings offer some practical and theoretical implications. Investors who are conscious about CG and attempt to maximize Sharpe measure by investing in strong governance firms may face lower portfolio risk by foregoing higher returns. Whereas reduction in value-at-risk midway onwards appears to suggest investment in companies with strong CG would less likely to fail in the long run. Volatility and downside volatility results tell similar story. Indeed, from the agency theoretical perspective, companies with strong CG would lead to lower agency cost (and risk) and better firm performance. We find profitable outcomes for both portfolios, although out-of-sample, weak governance portfolio dominates in terms of several key performance metrics.

Authors and Affiliations

Safwan Mohd Nor, Nur Zawawi

Keywords

Related Articles

Economic policy-makers and economic experts in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe: ways of interaction

Contemporary economic policy is a complex formation, which requires not only managerial priorities consideration, but also the explanation of scientific and technical expertise procedures. Changing socioeconomic situatio...

Trends in development of wholesale trade in Ukraine

The article focuses on the problems of the development of wholesale trade in Ukraine. Adapting the activities of wholesalers to the changes taking place in the wholesale market and the development of e-commerce in the co...

Insight into start-up, its action and surroundings

Start-ups are an appealing business form that gives space for self-realisation to enthusiastic, brave and creative people. The start-up progress is conditioned by the development of the business model. Other conditions f...

Implementation of sustainability aspects in the financial reporting system: an environmental accounting standard

In the field of financial accounting, similarly to the company management, besides considering economic aspects, arises a need to incorporate the influence of enterprise’s activities on environment and society. Neverthel...

FinTech sector and banking business: competition or symbiosis?

Introduction. The rapid development of the digital economy at the national and worldwide levels in recent decades has accelerated processes of transformation of financial systems and led to financialiation of the global...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP534380
  • DOI 10.21003/ea.V170-10
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Safwan Mohd Nor, Nur Zawawi (2018). Optimal portfolios vis-à-vis corporate governance ratings: some UK evidence. Economic Annals-XXI, 170(3), 57-63. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-534380