Oral versus written feedback delivery to nursing students in clinical education: A randomized controlled trial

Journal Title: Electronic Physician - Year 2017, Vol 9, Issue 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Feedback delivery is deemed as a key element during a students' clinical education. It keeps students on track to meet their goal and increase students' motivation and confidence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of feedback delivery in oral versus written feedback delivery to nursing students in clinical education. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted between February and August 2012 in the city of Bojnurd in Iran. Using purposive sampling, last semester's nursing students (n=44) had been randomly assigned to oral and written feedback delivery groups. Three Instructors received orientation and training on methods of feedback delivery before study initiation. Then, they gave necessary oral and written feedback to the students. Clinical settings of the study included coronary care, surgical, and neonatal units of hospitals. Data collection tools were quality of feedback delivery, students' satisfaction questionnaire and students' reactions checklist. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 11.5 with chi-square test and the t-test. RESULTS: Most of the students (52%, n=23) were male. There were no significant differences between the scores of quality of oral and written feedback delivery (p>0.05). The study did not show a difference of satisfaction level between the oral and written feedback groups. The relationship between students' reactions and feedback type at the confidence level of 90% was significant, so that students who received oral feedback showed more severe reactions as compared to the written feedback group. CONCLUSION: According to the results, the type of feedback is not an important factor in clinical education quality and satisfaction level. They may achieve a better outcome by focusing on the other aspects of quality of feedback delivery rather than feedback type. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the Iranian Registration Center for Clinical Trials with the Irct id: (IRCT: 201111128076N1). FUNDING: North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences (permission no. 89/p/209)

Authors and Affiliations

Vida Tayebi, Mohammad Reza Armat, Hamid Tavakoli Ghouchani, Fatemeh Khorashadizadeh, Alireza Gharib

Keywords

Related Articles

Evaluation of Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) deletion polymorphism on type 2 diabetes mellitus risk in a sample of Yazdian females in Yazd, Iran

Background: There has been much interest in the role of free radicals and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to assess the possible association between genetic pol...

Accuracy of pediatric residents in determination of dehydration in children with gastroenteritis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of pediatric residents in diagnosis of dehydration in children with gastroenteritis. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study in Dr. Sheikh Hospital...

The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases risk factors associated with psoriasis in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND: Extensive studies have revealed an increased risk of major adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with severe psoriasis. However, some studies show conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to a...

Relationship between self-care behaviors and health literacy among elderly women in Iran, 2015

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Self-care is a basic concept in health promotion, regarding the importance of health literacy as a key factor in self-care. This study aimed to identify the relationship between self-care behaviors an...

Exploring the challenges of the Iranian parliament about passing laws for resource allocation in healthcare: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Awareness about the process of law making and the factors that affect the legislative process have an important role in improving legislations that are approved by parliaments. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP325739
  • DOI 10.19082/5008
  • Views 76
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vida Tayebi, Mohammad Reza Armat, Hamid Tavakoli Ghouchani, Fatemeh Khorashadizadeh, Alireza Gharib (2017). Oral versus written feedback delivery to nursing students in clinical education: A randomized controlled trial. Electronic Physician, 9(8), 5008-5014. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-325739