Organizing for Ambidexterity: A Paradox-based Typology of Ambidexterity-related Organizational States

Journal Title: BAR: Brazilian Administration Review - Year 2015, Vol 12, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of how organizations become ambidextrous over time, identifying requirements for organizations to become ambidextrous, understanding how ambidexterity may emerge as an organizational property, as well as exploring likely connections of the ambidexterity property and organizing a firm’s activities and work. Conceptualizing the exploration-exploitation relationship as a paradoxical one, we advance two necessary conditions for organizing for ambidexterity: fostering paradox-coping tactics and precluding paradoxrelated traps. The interplay of these two conditions gives rise to a typology of four ambidexterity-related organizational states: ambidexterity-lacking organizations, monolithic organizations, short-term ambidextrous organizations and long-term ambidextrous organizations. The paper identifies each state’s distinct strengths and challenges concerning organizing for ambidexterity, and discusses theoretical, practical and policy-making implications.

Authors and Affiliations

Karrer, Daniel; Fleck, Denise

Keywords

Related Articles

Antecedents and Consequences of Consumer Trust in the Context of Service Recovery

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the antecedents and consequences of consumer trust after complaint handling episodes about services. A cross-sectional study was carried out with complainers of banks and airl...

When a Thousand Words Are (Not) Enough: An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Firm Performance and Attention to Shareholders

The aim of this study is to concurrently test the explanatory power of the attention-based view (ABV) of the firm and of the resource dependence theory (RDT). We propose a conceptual model of attention to shareholders b...

Between Two Worlds: an Ethnographic Study of Gay Consumer Culture in Rio de Janeiro

It is not easy to study socially marginalized groups such as gays, ethnic minorities, and others. This is, however, an extremely relevant topic in the consumer behavior area since the status of members of a modern consu...

Analysts’ Consensus and Target Price Accuracy: A Study in Latin America

Market analysts, by means of issuance of their opinions (earnings per share, target prices, and recommendations), have been the object of several earlier studies. Previous literature identifies analysts as information i...

IHRM in Developing Countries: Does the Functionalist vs. Critical Debate Make Sense South of the Equator?

A recent debate has taken place in International Human Resource Management (IHRM) theory and practice between the so-called functionalists and the critical approaches. This paper reviews the literature on mainstream, f...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP40608
  • DOI -
  • Views 256
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Karrer, Daniel; Fleck, Denise (2015). Organizing for Ambidexterity: A Paradox-based Typology of Ambidexterity-related Organizational States. BAR: Brazilian Administration Review, 12(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-40608