Outcome Measures in Spine Surgery: How Far Can we Go Building Evidence?

Journal Title: Journal of Orthopedics & Bone Disorders - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 3

Abstract

There is an imperative need to alleviate the actual and predictably harder burden of spine disorders and particularly the share due to chronic nonspecific low back pain, both at the individual and community-based viewpoint. Studies on global health trends charge a relevant part of the onus to the proposed invasive procedures, raising concern over its inappropriately high and growing use, counteracting clinical guidelines recommendation of a prudent selection of patients, based on clear-cut indications. Part of this gap between evidence and practice stands from questionable assumptions regarding the usefulness of surgery. Uncertainty on relative benefits and harms in the face of increased risk of adverse events, or the higher costs and health care resources involved, results in controversial decision-making to plan the intervention. Improvement of knowledge about these questions can be provided by the inclusion in the research agenda of comprehensive and standardized evaluation of outcomes after spine surgery. Such a protocol procedure would enable future systematic reviews to perform a consistent meta-analysis of data from trials, mandatory for high-quality evidence gathering. Outcome evaluation requires both subjective and objective assessments. This review aims to clarify the role of outcome measures in support of the need to build reliable information on the effectiveness of surgical treatment of spinal disorders.

Authors and Affiliations

Relvas H*, Fernandes O and Oliveira R

Keywords

Related Articles

The Inadequate Treatments for Patients before and after Osteoporotic Hip Fracture

Hip fracture will count for a significant problem in the aging group in the near future. Although the fracture is always being considered unexpected, either the fracture itself or the complication of the fracture treatme...

The Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN): A Commentary

The Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) is a virtual reality (VR)-based system that was developed by the Dutch company Motek Medical (Motekforce Link, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and has been used by clinici...

Complications after De Quervain’s Disease Surgery

Surgical treatment of De Quervain improves symptoms, obtains good and quickly results with a local anesthesia procedure. Allows almost early return to work with few restrictions. It can provide complete pain and function...

Prognostic Factors of Cervical Cord Injury

Aim: Identify prognostic factors of management of cervical spinal cord injury in a low income country. Patients and method: This was a retrospective descriptive study which took place over 4 years and half, from 1st Janu...

Mortality and Morbidity Associated with Periprosthetic Fracture after Total Knee Replacement

Background: Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty are a devastating consequence of an otherwise successful procedure. With an ageing population and extension of total knee arthroplasty to older patie...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP754060
  • DOI -
  • Views 22
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Relvas H*, Fernandes O and Oliveira R (2018). Outcome Measures in Spine Surgery: How Far Can we Go Building Evidence?. Journal of Orthopedics & Bone Disorders, 2(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-754060