Outcomes of Manual Reduction vs Arch Bars for Mandibular Angle Fractures

Journal Title: Archives of Otolaryngology and Rhinology - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 2

Abstract

Objective: To compare post-operative complications of mandibular angle fractures treated with manual reduction, arch bar maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), and non-arch bar MMF. Study Design: Retrospective chart review Methods: A retrospective review of patients with mandibular angle fractures at a tertiary care level 1 trauma center between 2001 and 2013. Reduction of the fracture(s) was classified into one of 3 groups: manual reduction, non-arch bar MMF, and arch bar MMF. The main outcome variables were post-operative malocclusion and infection. Results: The sample was composed of 176 patients: single angle fracture (n=47), angle with 1 non-angle fracture (n=118), angle with 2 non-angle fractures (n=10), and bilateral angle fractures (n=1). For all fractures, arch bar MMF was found to have significantly lower malocclusion rates than both manual reduction (2.8% vs 17.5%, p=0.01) and non-arch bar MMF (2.8% vs 13.3%, p=0.04). For patients with single angle fractures, there was no statistically significant difference in infection or malocclusion rates when comparing manual reduction, non-arch bar MMF, and arch bar MMF. For patients with an angle fracture plus 1 non-angle fracture, arch bar MMF had significantly lower malocclusion rates than manual reduction (3.2% vs 25.0%, p<0.01) and was not significantly different compared to non-arch bar MMF. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that manual reduction of single angle fractures may be the preferred method of stabilization. However, arch bar MMF is still the preferred method of stabilization and reduction for patients with a single angle fracture plus at least one additional fracture.

Authors and Affiliations

Schroeder II Ronald J, Archer Kaete, Kellman Robert, Suryadevara Amar

Keywords

Related Articles

Four cases of extracranial abscess caused by sinusitis exacerbated by a foreign body

Background: Foreign bodies in the paranasal sinus is a relatively rare. Furthermore, most of foreign bodies in the paranasal sinuses occur in the maxillary sinus, and reports of foreign bodies in frontal sinus are few. E...

Management of Cleft Lip and Palate: A Five Year Review

Introduction: Clefts of the lip may cause cosmetic and social problems. Clefts of the palate may affect feeding, speech and hearing. Objective: To document the clinical and epidemiological features, surgical techniques (...

Alteration of the Methylation Status of Urokinase Plasminogen Activator (uPA) is involved in Proliferation and Invasion of Nasopharyngeal Cancer Cells

The extracellular matrix degradation is the most important step in the process of tumor cell metastasis. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) can catalyzes the conversion of the inactive zymogen plasminogen to the...

Psychoneuroimmunology Applied to Otolaryngology

We have long known that emotions can affect health. Depression, anxiety, stress, all these have an effect on health. Psychoneuroimmunology - PS - studies the precise chemical and neural connections that are effected [1].

Otomycosis treatment: Topical Drops versus Cream – A prospective randomized study

Introduction: Otomycosis, is one of the most common conditions encountered in a ENT practice. Difference of opinion does exist regarding ideal treatment modality. Aim: Compare the treatment efficacy of 1% Clotrimazole d...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP352080
  • DOI 10.17352/2455-1759.000028
  • Views 76
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Schroeder II Ronald J, Archer Kaete, Kellman Robert, Suryadevara Amar (2016). Outcomes of Manual Reduction vs Arch Bars for Mandibular Angle Fractures. Archives of Otolaryngology and Rhinology, 2(2), 70-73. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-352080