Overlap of accessible information undermines the anchoring effect
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 1
Abstract
According to the Selective Accessibility Model of anchoring, the comparison question in the standard anchoring paradigm activates information that is congruent with an anchor. As a consequence, this information will be more likely to become the basis for the absolute judgment which will therefore be assimilated toward the anchor. However, if the activated information overlaps with information that is elicited by the absolute judgment itself, the preceding comparative judgment should not exert an incremental effect and should fail to result in an anchoring effect. The present studies find this result when the comparative judgment refers to a general category and the absolute judgment refers to a subset of the general category that was activated by the anchor value. For example, participants comparing the average annual temperature in New York City to a high 102 °F judged the average winter, but not summer temperature to be higher than participants making no comparison. On the other hand, participants comparing the annual temperature to a low –4 °F judged the average summer, but not winter temperature to be lower than control participants. This pattern of results was shown also in another content domain. It is consistent with the Selective Accessibility Model but difficult to reconcile with other main explanations of the anchoring effect.
Authors and Affiliations
Štěpán Bahník and Fritz Strack
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678228
- DOI -
- Views 162
- Downloads 0
Speakers’ choice of frame in binary choice: Effects of recommendation mode and option attractiveness
A distinction is proposed between recommending for preferred choice options and recommending against non-preferred choice options. In binary choice, both recommendation modes are logically, though not psychologically, eq...
Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options
Using five variants of the Asian Disease Problem, we dissected the risky-choice framing effect by requiring each participant to provide preference ratings for the full decision problem and also to provide attractiveness...
On the relative importance of the hot stove effect and the tendency to rely on small samples
Experiments have suggested that decisions from experience differ from decisions from description. In experience-based decisions, the decision makers often fail to maximise their payoffs. Previous authors have ascribed th...
Comparative evaluation of the forecast accuracy of analysis reports and a prediction market
This paper summarizes an empirical comparison of the accuracy of forecasts included in analysis reports developed by professional intelligence analysts to comparable forecasts in a prediction market that has broad partic...
Gender differences in the endowment effect: Women pay less, but won’t accept less
We explore different contexts and mechanisms that might promote or alleviate the gender effect in risk aversion. Our main result is that we do not find gender differences in risk aversion when the choice is framed as a w...