OWN-MYTHICAL MECHANISM OF THE WORLD’S HARMONY

Abstract

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of regularities of spiritual self-becoming. Purpose. The purpose of this study is the generalization, systematization and deepening from the mythological positions of the modern philosophical concepts routes in world’s harmony, to the constructive antilibration of the bipolarity human psyche. Methods. The author implements the mythological and profound psychological methods. Results. Person chose two ways of progress the monological or pseudomythical and dialogical or own-mythical. This logic suggests to man in the three-dimensional (or in the six-dimensional) world of opposition should not be seen as binary, but as a trinitary. The approach provides qualitative progress, development, opens the sense of struggle fiercely opposing beginning. The pseudomythical logic absolutizes a one part of the universal integrity, gives dialectics, rules out dialogue with the world of man. Especially the author focuses on harmonization the two main existential oppositions “Self-world polarity” (in particular “Self-God polarity”) and “male – female”. Person’s salvation is a synthesis of human and God which reflected in the idea of God-man. Sexual love regulates the opposite of masculine and feminine. So two genders are combined in integrity that approximate to God's integrity. This type of love implements the other kinds of love – love of Neighbor and love of Distant. After all, gender and love are connected with the mystery of discontinuity in the world and any secret connections. So, androgynism is a final combination of male and female in the God-like existence, final overcoming of collapse, restoring the image and likeness of God in man. A female essence, alienated by the time, is reunited with male nature through love and the human’s imagery recovering. Originality. The scientific novelty of the results involves the pan-mythological theory’s application of knowledge of the world. Also the author focuses on the Trinitarian model that solving the oppositions in the individual self. The scientist has approbation mechanisms of this model. Conclusion. The dialectically solving the two fundamental oppositions allows positively solve critical opposition – “corporal – spiritual”, “mental – spiritual”, “human – God” – through the phenomenon of man and life.

Authors and Affiliations

Vasyl PAKHARENKO

Keywords

Related Articles

INTELLIGENTSIA IN SHAPING THE SPIRITUAL IMAGE OF THE NATION

Introduction. In the article is considered one of the visions of the concept “intelligentsia”, its socio-cultural importance. Determine the fundamental task of the intelligentsia that is (re)creation of the spiritual ima...

EXPANSION OF WORLD VIEW AND OVERCOMING POWER DISCOURSE

Introduction. The article analyzes the process of spreading the worldview to an external audience. The problem is that most often the exhibited worldview becomes a part of the power's expansion in the minds of both: thos...

AN IDEA OF «STRUCTURE OF DAILY OCCURENCE» IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBALIZATION

«А structure» as a concept is known in different sciences from ancient times. It understands as totality of proof connections between segments in the system, that provide her monolithic nature. The culture of everyday l...

GENDER, WRITING AND IDENTITY: FROM FEMINITIV TO GENDER METAPHYSICS

Introduction. The relevance of the topic is determined by the search for modern philosophy, linguistics, social philosophy and psychology in the problem area of gender studies, which, with consistency, leads to cross-cut...

PHILOSOPHY OF HUMANISM AND DEMOCRACY

Introduction. Theory and methodology of philosophy of humanism and democracy is based on the concept of socio-humanistic, liberal-democratic values and principles developed by the author in 1980s. It provides competitive...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP531384
  • DOI -
  • Views 112
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vasyl PAKHARENKO (2015). OWN-MYTHICAL MECHANISM OF THE WORLD’S HARMONY. Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія, 364(31), 64-70. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-531384