Pace yourself: Improving time-saving judgments when increasing activity speed
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 2
Abstract
The time-saving bias describes people’s tendency to misestimate the time they can save by increasing the speed in which they perform an activity such as driving or completing a task. People typically underestimate time saved when increasing from a low speed and overestimate time saved when increasing from an already high speed. We suggest that this bias is the result of people’s failure to recognize the curvilinear relationship between increasing speed and reducing activity time: As initial speed rises, the same speed increases will yield smaller reductions in time. We explore a new technique to de-bias these faulty estimations: converting measurements of speed to a pace measure (e.g., minutes per fixed distance). Utilizing common driving scenarios, we show that participants who received pace data made more accurate estimations of journey duration at various speeds, time-savings at various speed increases and the required speed to complete a journey.
Authors and Affiliations
Eyal Peer and Eyal Gamliel
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678046
- DOI -
- Views 98
- Downloads 0
Theories of truth as assessment criteria in judgment and decision making
Hammond (1996) argued that much of the research in the field of judgment and decision making (JDM) can be categorized as focused on either coherence or correspondence (C&C) and that, in order to understand the findings o...
Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving
Some people find it more difficult to delay rewards than others. In three experiments, we tested a “future self-continuity” hypothesis that individual differences in the perception of one’s present self as continuous wit...
Speakers’ choice of frame in binary choice: Effects of recommendation mode and option attractiveness
A distinction is proposed between recommending for preferred choice options and recommending against non-preferred choice options. In binary choice, both recommendation modes are logically, though not psychologically, eq...
The relationship between crowd majority and accuracy for binary decisions
We consider the wisdom of the crowd situation in which individuals make binary decisions, and the majority answer is used as the group decision. Using data sets from nine different domains, we examine the relationship be...
Image Theory’s counting rule in clinical decision making: Does it describe how clinicians make patient-specific forecasts?
The field of clinical decision making is polarized by two predominate views. One holds that treatment recommendations should conform with guidelines; the other emphasizes clinical expertise in reaching case-specific judg...