PARADOXICAL ASPECT OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

Abstract

The article substantiates, that the variety of linguistic meanings and points that a person uses in the process of communication, gives the opportunity to «reconcile» the contradictory manifold of his motivations, including paradoxically. The variety of communicative meaningsis formed not only by the variety of signs, but also, for example, by the possibility of connecting a sign with another object (metaphor), a partial change in sign with the corresponding transformation of meaning (pun).There is curious example from the political sphere of changing meaning in the sign «ялинка», associated with the involuntary transformation by the previous president of Ukraine this sign into the «йолка». As a consequence, the meaning of «evergreen tree with needles» is transformed into the meaning «Ukrainian president, who does not know the Ukrainian language well». The contradictory «four-basicity» of politics, which we designate as the paradox of «four P» (particularity, publicity, populism, privilege) is coherent to diversity of motivations human’s behavior. The politics, managing social behavior, is designed to mobilize the motivation of the majority. This is being done with the help of political messages that generate political points, including manipulating the public constituent. The ineffectiveness of political communication in post-Soviet Ukraine is due to the eclectic compound of Soviet mental models in political messages in the form of bureaucratic — etatist and populist rhetoric with post-Soviet rhetoric of stylized patriotism and pseudo-market freedom. The roots of eclecticism are not only in the Soviet past, but also in the modern consumerization of the public component of politics. Relying on the paradox «follow your inclinations, overcoming them,» or otherwise avoiding the politicization of the non-political spheres of life and manipulating the «signed consumption» of the masses, you can try to return publicity to Ukrainian politics.

Authors and Affiliations

E. S. Ogarenko

Keywords

Related Articles

SPLIT BETWEEN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE: A CARDINAL CHANGE IN MODERNIZATION PROCESS OF POST-SOVIET AREA?

Russia was the first country to start power race with Europeans in 18th century. Three hundred years later, one must admit that the modernization process there is not over, remains quite chaotic and has led to mixed resu...

FEEDS OF REPORTS (SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE "POLITICAL PROBLEMS OF INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT")

Scientific conference for young teachers and masters who study in specialty 291 International Relations, Social Communications and Regional Studies, with the participation of Dean of the Faculty of International Relation...

INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL MIGRATION OF UKRAINIAN YOUNG PEOPLE: REASONS, CONSEQUENCES

The article includes analysis of empirical sociological study on student opinions about the causes of international educational migration of the Ukrainian youth and the consequences of its transformation into a work migr...

THE CTBT: POSSIBLE SUBSEQUENT DOMINO EFFECT OF THE U. S. RATIFICATION^ THE CONTEXT OF THE GLOBAL NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION REGIME

The article analyzes the need to find a way out of the crisis with the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty entry into force and its influence on the nuclear nonproliferation regime. The CTBT will be in force after all...

THE CONCEPT OF NATIONAL INTERESTS AND FOREIGN POLITICS OF CONTAMPORARY UKRAINE

The article is devoted to the problem of peculiarities of conceptual principles of foreign politics of Ukraine through the prism of the concept of national interests. National interests are expressed by general necessiti...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP514073
  • DOI 10.18524/2304-1439.2018.2(31).144313
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

E. S. Ogarenko (2018). PARADOXICAL ASPECT OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Соціологія і політичні науки, 23(2), 232-240. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-514073