Patient’s right to reproductive technologies: legal dimension

Abstract

The article analyses the problem of legal regulation of patient’s status using auxiliary reproductive technologies. It is specified that such rights do not have a clear legal regulation. International law has not yet developed a unified methodological approach to these human rights. Existing regulatory acts usually leave all questions for the consideration of the domestic law. The article focuses on the legal problems of regulation of these technologies: issues of legal regulation of the status of persons to whom ART is applied; the question of the possible excess of the limits of interference in the genetics of a person; the problem of selection of embryos in multiple pregnancies; legal regulation of reproductive technologies in the light of research activities refers to the possibility of using reproductive technologies not for procreation but for other purposes. First and foremost, this is the creation of an embryo of human beings for experimental purposes. There is also an emphasis on ensuring the equality of rights and freedoms of children born with the use of ART among other peers. The final problem is identified as a special treatment towards the storage and exchange of information on donors and surrogate mothers. In this context, an important issue is to create a genetic databank since such information may be necessary for the child or even his/her descendants. It is stated that the legislation on auxiliary reproductive technologies is fragmentary and inconsistent, which threatens to violate the rights and interests of patients. This means that there is a need to improve the current legislation. A law is required that combines biotic and reproductive issues. The main point is that such a regulatory act would promote the recognition at the state level the existence of human reproductive rights and ensure their implementation and would increase the protection of patients’ rights and their level of awareness and culture in the field of reproductive health.

Authors and Affiliations

М. Ю. Щирба

Keywords

Related Articles

Retrospective of the spiritual and social aspects of the springs of Greek-Catholic spirituality in the second half of the XIX century

The article deals with the socio-cultural and political-administrative situation in Galicia after joining the Austro-Hungarian monarchy. The aspects of the social activity of the clergy of the Greek Catholic Church in th...

The competence of Ukrainian law enforcement bodies as an object of study in the process of professional training for future lawyers

The article presents the results of the analysis of the category of competence of law enforcement bodies definition, the mechanisms and limits of which are enshrined in the normative legal acts of Ukraine, which regulate...

Issues of legal regulation of the payer of tax on immovable property other than land: comparative analysis and solutions

The article analyzes the normative fixing of the generic definition of the taxpayer and makes a comparative analysis of the legal regulation of the taxpayer for immovable property, different from the land plot in Ukraine...

The singularities of the snap parliamentary campaigns in Ukraine during the independence period

It has been researched that the snap parliamentary elections in the Independent Ukraine were conducted in the conditions of an increasing social tension or mass protests, and the crisis of cooperation between the highe...

Virtualization of the state as the newest characteristic of the age of globalization

In the process of universal virtualization, as a result of the rapid evolution of the latest information technology, the state both from the outside and from the middle gradually loses the traditional meaning of and is r...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP445596
  • DOI -
  • Views 116
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

М. Ю. Щирба (2017). Patient’s right to reproductive technologies: legal dimension. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 3(), 146-150. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-445596