Peculatus – Several Remarks on the Classification of the Offence of Embezzlement of Public Funds in Roman Law
Journal Title: Studia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe - Year 2012, Vol 2, Issue
Abstract
The offence of embezzlement of public funds – peculatus – is an interesting research subject due to the Roman legislator’s original approach to the issue of the classification of types of criminal offences (crimina). The paper aims to present Roman regulations concerning peculatus from the perspective of the methods of classifying its features as adopted by the compilers, taking into account both the normative contents of original laws (created by the original authors of these laws), as well as those added by later legislative factors: emperors, the senate and jurisprudence. The study of the Julian law on embezzlement of public funds may be conducted following the Justinian’s title Ad legem Iuliam peculatus et de sacrilegis et de residuis (Dig., 48, 13). Peculatus was the basic type of the offence of embezzlement of public funds. In the time of Augustus, two separate types of the offence isolated from peculatus, which were sacrilegium (probably within one law - lex Iulia peculatus) and embezzlement of a specific kind of money, i.e. pecunia residua (probably within a separate law - lex Iulia de residuis). Despite being quite precisely defined by the law, the type of the offence of embezzlement of public funds must have raised doubts when it came to applying the law, in cases where the act the offender was charged with came close to theft (crimen furti) or forgery (crimen falsi). p
Authors and Affiliations
Krzysztof Amielańczyk
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP266886
- DOI -
- Views 58
- Downloads 0
Book Reviews: Анатолий А. Турилов, Slavia Cyrillomethodiana: Источниковедение истории и культуры южных славян и Древней Руси. Межславянские культурные связи эпохи средневековья, „Знак“, Москва 2010, pp. 488; Анатолий А. Турилов, От Кирилла Философа до Константина Костенецкого и Василия Софиянина. История и культура славян IX–XVII вв., „Индрик“, Москва 2011, pp. 448; Анатолий А. Турилов, Межславянс
Book Review.
Book Reviews: Święci Konstantyn-Cyryl i Metody. Patroni Wschodu i Zachodu [Saints Constantine-Cyril and Methodius. Patrons of the East and the West], vol. I (pp. 254), vol. II (pp. 334), ed. Aleksander Naumow, Collegium Columbinum, Kraków 20131 [= Biblioteka Duchowości Europejskiej, 5].
Book Review.
Book Reviews: Лев VI Мудрый. Тактика Льва. Leonis imperatoris Tactica, изд. подгот. В.В. Кучма, ed. Н.Д. Барабанов, Алетейя, Санкт-Петербург 2012, pp. 368 [= Византийская библиотека. Источники].
Book Review.
Possessive Adjectives Formed from Personal Names in Polish Translations of the New Testament
The study focused on possessive adjectives derived by means of the suffixes -ow(y), -in, -sk- formed from proper personal names in old and contemporary translations of the New Testament. Adjectival derivatives have been...
Remarks on Some Tax Exempts in Ancient Rome
The author tries to classify the tax privileges that existed in Ancient Rome. He gives a few examples of reliefs and exemptions, and provides their short legal and lexical analyses. Finally, he discusses whether some of...