PENCABUTAN HAK POLITIK TERHADAP KORUPTOR DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA (Study Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.285 K/Pid.Sus/2015)

Journal Title: Diversi Jurnal Hukum - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Since the onset of reform, the issue of corruption eradication has always been a central theme in law enforcement in Indonesia. Corruption is a very serious matter, as corruption can harm the stability and security of the state and society. The application of the punishment of the revocation of political rights to the perpetrators of corruption by the judges gives pros and cons to the legal activists because its implementation is not in accordance with the Law, as well as the existence of violations of Human Rights. The decision of the Supreme Court in the Case of Ratu Atut Cosiyah is a violation of Human Rights because, in its decision, the application of the revocation of political rights is not based on the Act. I.e. does not specify how long / time limits in the revocation of political rights. The research of the problem in this research is What is the judge's consideration, in dropping the political rights to the perpetrator of corruption in Supreme Court decision Number 285 K / Pid. Sus / 2015 and how the Human Rights review in the revocation of political rights to the perpetrators of corruption in the Supreme Court decision Number 285 K / Pid.Sus / 2015 While the purpose of this study, namely to find out what judges judge consideration in depriving the political rights of perpetrators of corruption, and how the review of Human Rights Humans in depriving the political rights of perpetrators of corruption. The method used in this study is the normative juridical, which examines Supreme Court decisions Number 285 K / Pid.Sus / 2015. Sources of legal materials used in this study are primary, secondary, and non-legal sources of legal material. Techniques of collecting legal materials using literature review method or documentary study. The analysis is a qualitative analysis that aims to understand, interpret, and describe a reality. The author draws a deductive conclusion, drawing the conclusions of the things that are special, in which the two facts are bridged by theories

Authors and Affiliations

Ramma Hadi Saputra, Trinas Dewi Hariyana

Keywords

Related Articles

PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM AGRARIA DALAM RANGKA PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN

Sustainable development, especially in the field of agrarian law reform in Indonesia, is very necessary. To mind, the land issue is very urgent and is important to the rule in the land regulation of law which is complete...

POLITIK HUKUM PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK BERBASIS AGAMA DI INDONESIA

The Constitution and other legislation have guaranteed the upholding of religious freedom, but there are still acts of violation of religious freedom that lead to conflicts that are often found in Indonesia, whether the...

PERANAN HUKUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA E COMMERCE

E-commerce provides convenience in conducting trade. Internet media has no geographical limitation in the transaction does not close the possibility raises several problems in the event of a dispute. Law in that it has a...

REFLEKSI FILOSUFI TERKENDALANYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PANCASILA

Obstacles law enforcement in Indonesia in are caused by because of the officials and the community. Law oriented with family integralistik the contained in come pancasila need to be used as reference in law enforcement,...

PENCABUTAN HAK POLITIK TERHADAP KORUPTOR DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA (Study Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.285 K/Pid.Sus/2015)

Since the onset of reform, the issue of corruption eradication has always been a central theme in law enforcement in Indonesia. Corruption is a very serious matter, as corruption can harm the stability and security of th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP355467
  • DOI -
  • Views 64
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ramma Hadi Saputra, Trinas Dewi Hariyana (2017). PENCABUTAN HAK POLITIK TERHADAP KORUPTOR DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA (Study Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.285 K/Pid.Sus/2015). Diversi Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 42-69. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-355467