Perimetry Comparisons for Octopus G Top and Dynamic Programmes versus Humphrey 24-2 SITA Fast and SITA Standard Programmes

Journal Title: Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Aims: Previous comparisons of Octopus and Humphrey threshold programmes have shown differences, particularly for depth of defects. Recent developments have altered the Octopus background illumination. Thus, we sought to determine the subsequent extent of differences in results from commonly used central static programmes using Octopus and Humphrey perimeters. Study Design: Diagnostic accuracy study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ophthalmology, Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, between June 2009 and July 2012. Methodology: We utilised Octopus G-TOP or G-dynamic programmes and Humphrey 24-2 SITA fast or standard programmes. Poor reliability was taken as errors >25%. Comparison was made for global indices (mean sensitivity, mean deviation, pattern standard deviation/loss variance), test duration from each perimeter using unpaired t tests, and Bland Altman plots for correlation of individual differences between perimeters. Clinical agreement for presence/absence of visual field loss was determined by independent assessment of results by two authors (kappa test). Results: Eighty patients (159 eyes) were recruited. 38 eyes were excluded due to poor reliability. 34 patients (55 eyes) underwent fast static visual field assessment: 17 males and 17 females with a mean age of 63 years (SD 14). 38 patients (64 eyes) underwent standard static visual field assessment: 18 males and 20 females with a mean age of 65 years (SD 13). For both full and fast perimetry, both perimeters showed good agreement for inter observer comparison (K=0.5-0.6). SITA standard perimetry showed a higher mean sensitivity value (+2.5dB±1.0) and SITA fast perimetry showed a higher mean sensitivity value (+3.4dB±1.1) than Octopus values. Bland-Altman analysis showed increasing variability with increasing severity of defect indicating a lack of correlation for moderate to severe visual field results. Conclusions: Visual field results were comparable for mild defects. Octopus perimetry continues to show greater defect size where there is more extensive visual field loss relating to the different strategies used by both perimeters.

Authors and Affiliations

Fiona J. Rowe, Manijeh Wishart, Sarah Spencer

Keywords

Related Articles

Fluoxetine, a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Overdose Resulting in a Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

Aim: We present a rare case of Central retinal vein occlusion after prolonged use of Fluoxetine. Case Presentation: A 28 year old patient presented with clinical picture of Central retinal vein occlusion after prolonged...

Applications of Thin Films in Ophthalmology

Nanotechnology provides a revolutionary approach to therapeutic challenges. Drug delivery, gene therapy, novel diagnostic methods and tissue engineering rank among the main fields of current nanomedical research. Thin fi...

A Clinical Sign for Aiding the Diagnosis of Unilateral Subconjunctival Orbital Fat Herniation

Subconjunctival orbital fat herniation is a rare occurrence. These masses can be easily mis-diagnosed as more sinister lesions. We present a unilateral case of this condition and a useful, previously undescribed clinical...

Assessment of the Role of Central Corneal Thickness in Measuring the Intra-ocular Pressure in the Screening for Glaucoma amongst People Residing in a Sub-Himalayan Territory of North India

Aims: To find out the average central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) and to determine the prevalence of ocular hypertension in the study group. Methods: It was a cross sectional study conducted o...

Bilateral Combined Retinal Vascular Occlusion: An Ocular Presentation in Central Nervous System Re-relapse of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma

Aim: We describe an atypical case of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL), presenting with ocular manifestations. Presentation: Here we present an extremely rare case of a 63 year old...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP338928
  • DOI 10.9734/OR/2014/7073
  • Views 85
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Fiona J. Rowe, Manijeh Wishart, Sarah Spencer (2014). Perimetry Comparisons for Octopus G Top and Dynamic Programmes versus Humphrey 24-2 SITA Fast and SITA Standard Programmes. Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal, 2(1), 24-42. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-338928