Philosophers’ View concerning the Quiddity and Function of Practical Intellect
Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2011, Vol 43, Issue 87
Abstract
Philosophers view the advantage of human soul over animal soul in theoretical and practical intellect. However, there is disagreement among them in stating the quiddity of these two intellects. With a deliberation on their words, at least four interpretations can be implied from these two intellects. After reporting the statements and expressing the functions of practical intellect, the article goes on to evaluate and explain the selected theory. The generally accepted view among the later scholars is that there is no more than one intellect in human soul, which understands all the general sciences and rulings. However, since some of these sciences are merely theoretical and dedicated to external and noumenal realities, they are called theoretical intellects. In this interpretation the distinction of the two intellects from one another is nominal and is in their objects of perceptions (mudrakāt). As maintained in the article, despite its popularity, this interpretation is not of interest to the distinguished philosophers and is facing various problems. But other statements, with slight tolerance, can be referred to a single comprehensive interpretation; i.e. The first and essential act of practical intellect is to infer partial practical rulings from general rulings of theoretical intellect, and since these rulings in the sovereignty of intellect over physical faculties cause the appearance of will in the soul for issuance of voluntary acts and human fabrications, the practical intellect is also called “practical faculty”.
Authors and Affiliations
Alireza Najafzadeh
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP203154
- DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v43i2.4147
- Views 120
- Downloads 0
A investigation into the meaning of the monotheism word
Muslim scholars differ widely on the meaning of the pure word ‘Lā Illāha Illa Allāh’ (There is no god expect for God) and its indication to monotheism. A number of possibilities have been raised pertaining to this exalte...
"This is the Way and the Only Way" Critical Review of the Possibility of Recognizing the Religious Pluralism Approach in Teachings of Jainism and Buddhism
Employment of the famous story of "the Blind Men and the Elephant" by some philosophers of religion in religious pluralism discourses, which is originally brought up first in the texts of Jainism and then Buddhism, can l...
Manifestation of Divine Unity in Human Soul from the Viewpoints of Ibn ‘Arabī and Mullā Ṣadrā
Islam stresses on the unity of God, and as Muslim thinkers mostly view the human being as God's vicegerent who is an object of manifestation for Divine Attributes and who enjoys Divine Image, and in one respect, regard m...
Compassionate and Satanic Inner Thoughts from the Viewpoint of Mullā Ṣadrā’s
According to Mullā Ṣadrā, inner thought (khāṭir) in terms of a message, has three main components: 1. Sender of the message, 2. Content of the message, 3. Recipient of the message. Compassionate inner thought is a messag...
Finality of Prophethood from the Viewpoint of Contemporary Thinkers
Finality of prophethood is among the fundamental components of Islam, according to which the Prophet of Islam (S.A.W.) is the last of the prophets and Islam is the last of the revealed religions. The principle of finalit...