Philosophers’ View concerning the Quiddity and Function of Practical Intellect

Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2011, Vol 43, Issue 87

Abstract

Philosophers view the advantage of human soul over animal soul in theoretical and practical intellect. However, there is disagreement among them in stating the quiddity of these two intellects. With a deliberation on their words, at least four interpretations can be implied from these two intellects. After reporting the statements and expressing the functions of practical intellect, the article goes on to evaluate and explain the selected theory. The generally accepted view among the later scholars is that there is no more than one intellect in human soul, which understands all the general sciences and rulings. However, since some of these sciences are merely theoretical and dedicated to external and noumenal realities, they are called theoretical intellects. In this interpretation the distinction of the two intellects from one another is nominal and is in their objects of perceptions (mudrakāt). As maintained in the article, despite its popularity, this interpretation is not of interest to the distinguished philosophers and is facing various problems. But other statements, with slight tolerance, can be referred to a single comprehensive interpretation; i.e. The first and essential act of practical intellect is to infer partial practical rulings from general rulings of theoretical intellect, and since these rulings in the sovereignty of intellect over physical faculties cause the appearance of will in the soul for issuance of voluntary acts and human fabrications, the practical intellect is also called “practical faculty”.

Authors and Affiliations

Alireza Najafzadeh

Keywords

Related Articles

The Relation of Awwal, Ākhar, Ẓāhir, and Bāṭin to the Perfect Human Being

In theoretical mysticism, many of the mystical issues are attributed to the Qur'ānīc verses, among which is the noble verse "He is the First, He is the Last, He is the Manifest, He is the Unmanifest." The mystics have mo...

A Comparative Study of the Consequences of Faith from the Viewpoints of Paul and Fakhr Rāzī

One of the most important issues of Abrahamic Religions is faith. Paul the Apostle and Fakhr Rāzī, two thinkers in two religious fields of Christianity and Islam, have expressed their opinions in details in this regard....

An Analysis of the Textology of Imam al-Rizā (A.S.)’s Ziyārat Nāma Based of the Theory of Speech Function

The theory of speech function is one of the most significant theories affecting on the two fields of the philosophy of language and the language of religion. Austin, the developer of this theory, named the application of...

Types and Techniques of Education from the Viewpoint of Ṣadr al-Mut’allihīn

From the viewpoint of Ṣadr al-Mut’allihīn and under the influence of the principles of transcendental philosophy, the reality of education is to remove the obstacles from the way of Divine Emanation. With some methods, h...

Examining the disagreement between Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra on unity and the conceptual differences of divine names and attributes

The truth about Divine Names and the meanings of Divine Names and Attributes have always been regarded as key issues in Islamic theology and philosophy, and their surrounding debates have so far triggered controversial a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP203154
  • DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v43i2.4147
  • Views 87
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Alireza Najafzadeh (2011). Philosophers’ View concerning the Quiddity and Function of Practical Intellect. جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام, 43(87), 141-164. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-203154