Philosophical and anthropological studies in NaUKMA: the problem of human as a moral and ethical being

Abstract

Last year, the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” celebrated the 25 th anniversary. This article confines to this very special event and analyzes three important anthropological studies that deal with moral components of human being. The research directions have been formed at the Department since its establishment in 1992. The first part of the article focuses mainly on the Kantian studies. According to Kant’s anthropology, human nature should be explored on two levels: empirical and intelligible. Empirical level deals with general causality and considers the human being as the one entirely determined by nature. The second level considers the man from the perspective of freedom, moral activity, capacity to create aims and legislation. The research primarily gives a general scale of Kantian intelligible anthropology, which appears as a two-dimensional framework and consists of moral anthropological perspective and the one which Kant calls anthroponymy. Only the combination of these two aspects can allow us to comprehend the human nature as a whole. The second section of this article will shed a light on the Nietzschean anthropological theory. The paper elucidates three basic dimensions of Nietzschean critical anthropology. First of all, of the author comments on Nietzsche’s critique of Christian morality. Next, he articulates the Nietzschean idea of self-overcoming. Finally, the author identifies the main features of his genealogy of morality. All those components bound together can provide a wide horizon of Nietzschean opinion on the ethical dimension of human being. The last part of this article considers modern techno-anthropology in a broad sense. The problem of human and technology relation is considered in an ethical dimension, which unites all the three research directions. In this section, the author discusses the main components of technological mediation and non-neutrality. Using these two concepts, he proves that human nature (even in its ethical dimension) is not an autonomous and independent actor but the one that is deeply connected with the world and others through technology.

Authors and Affiliations

Dmytro Mykhailov

Keywords

Related Articles

Ambivalation of the Author’s role in a photographic image

This article questions the role of the author in the photographical image. Undoubtedly, the invention of photography has changed our attitude towards ourselves, towards the world. The impact of photography on one’s life...

Утопія і нігілізм: філософські уроки Лєшека Колаковського

У статті проаналізовано основні аспекти тлумачення філософського мислення польським філософом Лєшеком Колаковським (1927–2009) тією мірою, якою вони пов’язані з питанням автономності мислення. Метою є реконструкція принц...

Antropological views of Markelin Olesnytskyi

The article deals with the anthropological views of M. Olesnytskyі, a professor at the Kyiv Theological Academy (КТА), whose creative work has not yet been properly studied. It reveals the connection of his anthropologic...

Critical bibliography practices: integrating the KTA biblical studies in the European theological research context (the second half of the 19th – early 20th ct.)

In this article, the author explores one of the avenues through which the experiences of the European biblical studies were implemented in the Kyiv Theological Academy (КТА) in the second half of the 19th and early 20t...

Дослідження католицизму на сторінках журналу «Труды Киевской духовной академии» (1860-ті – початок 1900-х рр.)

У статті вперше здійснено цілісний та систематичний аналіз студій вихованців і викладачів Київської духовної академії, присвячених засадам віровчення, історії та тогочасному стану католицизму, що були надруковані в журна...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP486286
  • DOI 10.18523/2617-16781141911
  • Views 41
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dmytro Mykhailov (2018). Philosophical and anthropological studies in NaUKMA: the problem of human as a moral and ethical being. Наукові записки НаУКМА. Філософія та релігієзнавство, 0(), 3-11. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-486286