Possibility of Qiṣāṣ (Retaliated Punishment) of Father by the Child in Legal Opinions and Penal Laws
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2012, Vol 44, Issue 90
Abstract
The impossibility of qiṣāṣ of father for murdering the child is unanimously agreed upon by the Imāmī jursprudents; however, presuming that the father does not directly commit murder of the child and the child inherits the right for qiṣāṣ against the father from the victim of crime, there is disagreement among the jurisprudent as to whether the child can retaliate the father in qiṣāṣ or not. In this respect, a group of jurisprudents believe in the impossibility of qiṣāṣ of father. The evidences adduced by these jurisprudents include: priority analogy, the narration lā yaqādu wālidun bi waladihī (father is not retaliated for [killing] the child), the narration on qadhf (false accusation of unchastity), the general evidences concerning enjoinment of doing good to parents and keeping their company honorably. A group of jurists have issued a legal decision (ḥukm) for the possibility of qiṣāṣ of father on this matter, too. This group of jurisprudents, while rejecting the allusion to the priority analogy or to the narration on qadhf, have resorted to being content with agreed certitude in withdrawal from the application of qiṣāṣ evidences and have regarded the issue in question as included in generalities of qiṣāṣ evidences. In this article, while doing a critical review of the evidences of both groups, the second view is preferred. Islamic Penal Code, approved in 1370/1991, as well as the draft of Islamic Penal Code of 1388/2009 simply point out that if the murderer is the father or grandfather of the murdered person and the presumption discussed in this article is briefly carried out. Therefore, the jurisprudential analysis of this issue is of significance in clarifying the legal decision of this issue.
Authors and Affiliations
‘Alī MurāD ḤAydarī
Identifying dementia as an issue
Since the formulation of rulings is directly related to the refinement of issues, the present paper aims at outlining the extent of a mental disorder namely dementia, so that from this perspective an acceptable separatio...
Right of Passage (Ḥaq al-Mārra) in New perspective
The person, who, on his way, encounters a fruit-bearing tree belonging to others, can eat from its fruit as much as fulfilling his need, provided that his reaching to that tree has been accidental rather than on purpose;...
An Exploration into the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.)’s Midnight Prayer
This article addresses the ordinance of midnight prayer (ṣalāt al-layl) upon the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.). Given the verses of the Qur’an and the traditions related from the Shī‘as and the Sunnīs as well as the sayings of t...
Possibility of Qiṣāṣ (Retaliated Punishment) of Father by the Child in Legal Opinions and Penal Laws
The impossibility of qiṣāṣ of father for murdering the child is unanimously agreed upon by the Imāmī jursprudents; however, presuming that the father does not directly commit murder of the child and the child inherits th...
Reappraising the Theory of Imposing Condition for Numerous Confessions in Proving Adultery
Adultery is proved only through numerous and frequent confessions (four times) and confession to less than that would not invoke legal punishment (ḥadd). This view is widely accepted by the Imāmī jurists. Among them, how...