Post Harvest Studies on Yam Tubers Dioscorea rotundata Poir. Pre-Treated With Bio- Pesticides against Soil Pests and Pathogen

Journal Title: Journal of Plant Science and Research - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Post-harvest loses has been the bane of yam farmers over the years negating effort, resources and time invested in crop production. Farmers need to be equipped with pesticide alternatives for yam minisett seed dressing that are affordable, available, non-toxic to man and environmentally friendly. Postharvest investigation was conducted on yam tubers harvested from field planted with minisett yams Dioscorea rotundata cv abii pre-treated with fruit powder of Azadirachta indica and Piper guineense in comparism with Apon plus 50DS and Minisett dust (NRCRI) as seed dressing at 2.7kg/ha against soil pests and pathogens. The germination / sprouting of the yam tubers was not significantly (P>0.05) affected by the bio- pesticides. At 16 weeks in storage, all the treatments except Minisett dust significantly controlled or reduced weight loss of yam tubers. The treatments significantly controlled yam rot while Piper guineense performed best. Nematode infestation (root knot galled tuber and Scutellonem bradys cracks) on yam tubers was effectively controlled (by Piper guineense, Azadirachta indica followed by Apron plus 50DS and Minisett dust treatment. Storage insects Araecerus fasciculatus Degeer and (Coleoptera Anthribidae) attacked all pre-treated and untreated (control) tubers in storage. Analysis of the yam tuber nutrient composition showed no significant difference in carbohydrate, protein, fat ash, and fiber contents compared with the composition of the untreated tubers (control). Apron plus treatment however, appeared to lower protein content of yam tubers and the yam tissue of Dioscrea rotundata cv abii. The study concluded that the use of A. indica and P. guineense fruit dust as seed treatment will encourage shelve life and higher production of seed yams which will affect the market value of planting materials positively. Therefore it is recommended for wide spread farmers awareness and use through extension advocacy.

Authors and Affiliations

Aghale Duke Nduka

Keywords

Related Articles

Bio Stimulant Activity of Protein Hydrolysate: Influence on Plant Growth and Yield

Fertilization practices and growing techniques play a major role in influencing plant productivity. Fertilizers which have minimum impact on the environment are gaining popularity. In this regard, organic bio-stimulants...

Opportunity, Problems and Production Status of Vegetables in Ethiopia: A Review

Vegetables provide an abundant and inexpensive source of energy, body-building nutrients, vitamins and minerals. This review paper was aimed to recognize opportunities, constraints and potentials in Ethiopia for producti...

Fungal Spoilage of Stored Fruits of Carica papaya L. and Vitis vinifera L. and Fungitoxicity of Plants Extracts

The sample of fruits of Carica papaya L. and Vitis vinifera L. were collected from fruit vendors, fruit shops and mandies of Gorakhpur and bought to the laboratory in pre sterilized polythene bags. A total of 36 fungi as...

Putatively Expressed Proteins in GM Crops for Insect Pest Resistance

The growing demands to produce more food and fibre to feed increasing population and also for reducing chemical inputs in agriculture to overcome adverse affects impetus to the development of alternative forms of insect-...

Post Harvest Studies on Yam Tubers Dioscorea rotundata Poir. Pre-Treated With Bio- Pesticides against Soil Pests and Pathogen

Post-harvest loses has been the bane of yam farmers over the years negating effort, resources and time invested in crop production. Farmers need to be equipped with pesticide alternatives for yam minisett seed dressing t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP326391
  • DOI -
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Aghale Duke Nduka (2016). Post Harvest Studies on Yam Tubers Dioscorea rotundata Poir. Pre-Treated With Bio- Pesticides against Soil Pests and Pathogen. Journal of Plant Science and Research, 3(1), 1-4. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-326391