POSTMETAPHYSICS ONTOLOGY AND PRAGMATICS OF PHILOSOPHICAL AND CLINICAL DISCOURSE

Journal Title: Схід - Year 2016, Vol 146, Issue 6

Abstract

The purpose is to identify common and distinctive features of concepts and methodology of the problem of subject within different discourses, implicitly or explicitly relevant to the definition of "clinical" mode of human existence. The research methodology combines techniques of discourse analysis and basic principles of historical and philosophical studies. Scientific novelty of the research lies in definition of the clinical philosophical discourse as a special communicative process, where utterances not only focus on disease syndromes, and reveal phenomenology of inner experience of a pathological self, but also structure a certain type of sociality. Clinical discourse represents the space where the patient is treated not as a subject but as an object of disease. Ontology of clinical discourse prevails over ontology of disease, since its structures determine the notion of disease as such. Categorization of the disease, the idea of disease as a phenomenon subdued to professional authority leads to the idea of the need for patient's isolation from the natural environment and removing him to special social institutions. A great while authenticity of the individual had been determined through the testimony of others and manifestation of one's connection to others; then authenticity begun to establish trough the discourse, which individual was able or obliged to deliver about himself/herself. The clinicist doctrines share the intention to reduce the patient's self to its bodily dimension, while ignoring social determinants of psychological deviations. Conclusions of the study are summarized in the following positions: the current clinical discourse is based on the positivist-biological trend in humanitarian knowledge and it is the basis for the production and reproduction of medical and pharmaceutical repressive ideology; philosophical clinical discourse opens the possibility of overcoming the dominance of purely clinicist discourse; such a transformation is possible only after a paradigm shift in understanding the category of subject.

Authors and Affiliations

V. M. Skyrtach, Vasyl Gontar

Keywords

Related Articles

Problems and prospects of financing the rehabilitation of hydropower plants project by the World Bank in Ukraine

The article deals with the financing of investment projects by the World Bank, especially the rehabilitation of hydropower plants. It is noted that cooperation with Ukraine World Bank launched since 1992. The World Bank...

TYPES OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL'S STRATEGIES: APPROACHES TO SYSTEMATIZATION

The paper argues for the need for Ukrainian companies' intellectual capital strategy development which, in turn, will significantly improve their efficiency and transfer to a new level of functioning. In this study we pr...

Confessional identity of Orthodox Ukrainians in the conditions of modern calls

The problems related to confessional identity of Orthodox Ukrainians in the conditions of modern calls are analysed in the article. Religious identification is a major mechanism of socialization and education of personal...

INFORMATION SUPPORT OF MARKETING IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY

The paper looks into one branch of Ukrainian economy - the food industry. It is established that marketing activities of food industry companies have some specific features, namely mismatching of an agricultural performa...

THE DIALECTIC OF NEO-MYTHOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF "CARNIVAL RITUAL" PERSON IN THE WORKS BY YURIY ANDRUKHOVYCH

Artistic practices of postmodern art do not only express the principles of the conceptions of the world of modern culture but on the whole they prepare the anthropological "project" of a cosmopolit. But the danger of lev...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP425060
  • DOI 10.21847/1728-9343.2016.6(146).91800
  • Views 163
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

V. M. Skyrtach, Vasyl Gontar (2016). POSTMETAPHYSICS ONTOLOGY AND PRAGMATICS OF PHILOSOPHICAL AND CLINICAL DISCOURSE. Схід, 146(6), 115-119. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-425060