Practitioners Preference and Criteria on Deciding the Surgical Technique of Implant Placement in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Flap vs. Flapless Techniques

Journal Title: Open Access Journal of Dental Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 3, Issue 9

Abstract

1.1. Introduction: Dental implants placement has become an established treatment modality to replace missing teeth in Saudi Arabia with high success rates. And with the evolution in the surgical techniques; the practitioners and patients are looking for simpler and less traumatic surgical techniques. 1.2. Methodology: An online questionnaire form was distributed to the practitioners that perform dental implant therapy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It was distributed by Google forms using convenience sampling. The encoding of the answers was done using Microsoft Excel and statistical analysis was done using the 22nd version of SPSS. The frequencies of the submitted data were measured using the mode and median for the nominal and ordinal variables respectively and the correlations between the different variables was done using the Chi-square test. 1.3. Results: 45 practitioners participated in the study. 14 were from the governmental sector and 31 from the private. The specialists were the highest group to participate. Between the flap and flapless techniques; 29 (64.4%) preferred the flap technique over the flapless technique which was preferred by 16 (35.6%). 86.7% perform clinical intraoral measurements and 82.2% request CBCT Scans. The majority of participants 36 (80.1%) felt comfortable performing a flapless technique surgery when the width of the bone at the implant site was 6 mm or more. The top advantage by 15 (33.3%) was that it reduces trauma to the patient. 1.4. Conclusion: With the choice of the flapless surgical technique; the frequency of requesting CBCTs and surgical guides increases, the practitioners feel confident using the flapless technique for single implant placement and to avoid hemorrhagic tendencies of patients on anti-coagulants, and the main advantage observed by the practitioners is the reduced trauma to the patient, overall the flap surgical technique is still preferred by the practitioners over the flapless technique.

Authors and Affiliations

Rakan Shaheen

Keywords

Related Articles

Alternative Option to Treat Crowding by Direct Veneering Layering (Case Report)

Introduction: A thirty one years old male patient attended our private dental clinic complaining of crowding in the mandibular six anterior teeth. The patient refused any kind of orthodontics treatment. Also he refused a...

Marginal Adaptation, Fracture Resistance and Failure Patterns of Two CAD/CAM Overlays

Statement of problem Coronal rehabilitation of endodontically treated posterior teeth is still a controversial issue. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate marginal adaptation, fracture resistance and fai...

“Chronic Periodontitis-An Oral Microbial Disease too Common?” A Short Review

A group of diseases affecting the surrounding and supporting tissues of the teeth constitutes the periodontal disease and includes all diseases of the periodontium. Gingival inflammation, periodontal pocket formation, de...

Expression of Oncofoetal Marker Carcino Embryonic Antigen in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective: Expression of the oncofoetal glycoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), has been extensively studied, particularly regarding its potential role as a marker of early cancer and as a prognostic indicator. CEA...

Oral Piercing: Practice or Prejudice?

From the dawn of civilization human beings were seen to decorate their bodies with different kinds of ornaments, be it a piece of shell, stone, bone or metal. Jewellery became a form of adornment, sometimes for protectio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP420261
  • DOI 10.23880/oajds-16000208
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rakan Shaheen (2018). Practitioners Preference and Criteria on Deciding the Surgical Technique of Implant Placement in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Flap vs. Flapless Techniques. Open Access Journal of Dental Sciences, 3(9), 1-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-420261