Praetor peregrini as an epistemological model of contemporary comparative lawyer (toward a question about comparison as a philosophical thinking of legal postmetaphysic)

Abstract

Contemporary jurisprudence has appeared before opportunity and necessity to afford itself as a sphere of independent methodological thinking, i.e. awareness itself as a project law-as-philosophy. Justifications of logic of lawmaking are one of the most important ques- tions within such project. Content of reflection of philosophical nature of law are establish of algorithm of metaphysic overcoming. Discourse of philosophy-methodological originality of jurisprudence is demand rethinking of jurisprudence’ own logic. Formality of logical impli- cation doesn’t ensure legal assertions’ logicality. Legal logic doesn’t separate from discourse: language and logic are inseparable and thereby law gets logical language. Law-as-philoso- phy discourse is deconstruction of legal logic. Possibilities of displacement of concept tertium comparationis semantic content as tran- sition from its ontological to epistemological interpretation are showing in the article. Ones transitions postulated as gnoseological framework of overcoming of metaphysics. Forming of postmetaphysical legal thinking as independent philosophy discourse supposes recognition of legal comparison as legal logic. Such logic are proposes to consider practical syllogism of legal comparison circular (postmetaphysic) construction. Deconstruction of formal logic is discourse of legal epistemology. Circle construction of legal comparison is instrument of men- tioned discourse. Legal comparison logic is logic of lawmaking. Therefore significance of contemporary comparative lawyer is similar to praetor peregrini role for the creations of Roman law.

Authors and Affiliations

Oleksandr Tkachenko

Keywords

Related Articles

Legal Aspects of Integrated and Sustainable Development of Rural Areas of Ukraine

This article deals with the concept of «integrated and sustainable rural development»; author researched positive and negative trends of legal regulation of environmental, econom- ic and social components of sustainable...

IV International scientific and practical conference "Legal facts in the system of legal regulation" to the 145th anniversary of the academician of the VUAN S. Dnistryansk

IV International scientific and practical conference "Legal facts in the system of legal regulation" to the 145th anniversary of the academician of the VUAN S. Dnistryansk

Conflicts and contradictions in the mechanism of interaction between civil society and the state in modern Ukraine

The article investigates the problem of conflict relations of civil society and public author- ities. Are considered essential and substantial characteristics of conflicts and contradictions in the process of interaction...

The problems of normative and legal and institutional provision of constitutional and legal responsibility in Ukraine

In the article the problems of constitutional legal regulation and institutional provision of constitutional and legal responsibility in Ukraine are researched. The normative-legal basis of the constitutional and legal r...

The principles of the constitutional and legal responsibility: its con- ceptual and typical characteristic

In the article the theoretical problems of principles of constitutional and legal responsi- bility are researched. The problem of the principles of constitutional and legal responsibility – fundamental ideas, grounds tha...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP447163
  • DOI -
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Oleksandr Tkachenko (2016). Praetor peregrini as an epistemological model of contemporary comparative lawyer (toward a question about comparison as a philosophical thinking of legal postmetaphysic). Правова держава. Щорічник наукових праць (Pravova derzhava), 27(), 431-438. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-447163