Pre-service primary teachers' argumentation in socioscientific issues

Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2018, Vol 0, Issue 0

Abstract

Even in the context of a university science course, students make and attempt to defend unscientific claims in personal and scientific contexts. This research examined a random sample of rhetorical arguments submitted by 130 first-year students in a pre-service primary teaching program for the presence and quality of research evidence and reasoning. Students were strongly encouraged to review the evidence with an open mind before taking a stance. Arguments were analysed by identifying elements of Toulmin's Argument Pattern (Toulmin, 1958) and evaluating the quality of and relationships between these elements using SOLO Taxonomy (Biggs & Collis, 1982). For the most part, students’ claims aligned with scientific consensus; for example, that climate change is almost certainly anthropogenic. However, a small number of students submitted pseudoscientific claims, such as that fluoride should not be added to the water supply. Such claims lack evidence, contradict existing evidence that comes from a strong methodological basis, or rest on weak evidence that comes from a poor methodological basis. Sometimes these claims rely on faulty reasoning or logical fallacies. Concern is not only for those students who have submitted pseudoscientific claims, but also for those students who have presented claims that reflect scientific consensus yet defend those claims with shoddy evidence or poor reasoning. If students cannot distinguish between scientific and pseudoscientific claims, evidence and reasoning, how will they make robust decisions about health, how money should be spent, and how and what they will teach their future students?

Authors and Affiliations

Charlotte Pezaro| School of Education, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia, For correspondence: c.pezaro@uq.edu.au, Tony Wright| School of Education, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia, Robyn Gillies| School of Education, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia

Keywords

Related Articles

A time profile of mathematics in a ‘gap year’ in Irish secondary schools

The Irish education system is unique in an international context as it sets aside a full school year for a transition and youth development programme in the middle of secondary education. The Transition Year (TY) program...

Effect of polya problem-solving model on senior secondary school students’ performance in current electricity

This study was designed to investigate the Effect of Polya Problem-Solving Model on Senior School Students’ Performance in Current Electricity. It was a quasi experimental study of non- randomized, non equivalent pre-tes...

Light pollution in natural science textbooks in Spanish secondary education

Light pollution has emerged with the industrial development in recent decades. It is becoming a significant environmental issue for cities today and it will probably become more important in the near future. However, ver...

A field study examining success factors of university-schoolcollaboration

With decreasing numbers of students pursuing a career in science (OECD, 2008), the call for educational reforms building a basis for an interest in science is great. Cooperation between schools and universities are an im...

The coexistence claim and its possible implications for success in teaching for conceptual “change”

This article presents recent research results in mental chronometry and neuroimaging that support the coexistence of multiple conceptions. It then presents and elaborates on six possible implications for an adherence to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP8165
  • DOI -
  • Views 397
  • Downloads 25

How To Cite

Charlotte Pezaro, Tony Wright, Robyn Gillies (2018). Pre-service primary teachers' argumentation in socioscientific issues. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 0(0), 0-0. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-8165