Predatory Publication in Science and Ethical Principles: Features and Solutions

Abstract

Purpose: The scientific endeavor necessitates publication and assessment of research output with peer-review at its core. Conventional academic publication models, research appraisal, and peer-review procedures, on the other hand, have always been open to abuse and malpractice, putting the integrity of research at risk and exposing the scholarly communication system to overt economic predation. Predatory journals are a well-known problem in scientific publication, and they serve as repository for fabricated research. The volume of predatory journals has increased in recent years, and thus it is vital to propose a resolution to this problem. A well-known problem in scientific publishing is predatory journals, and they are repositories for phony research. The volume of predatory journals has risen in recent years, and it is imperative to present a solution for this academic fraud. Methodology: In this review, the researchers conducted a systematic literature search of the following databases that included Web of Science (all databases), online library repositories. All processes of the review stages included access to the search results and full articles for review and consequent analysis. Articles were added after screening full text articles by meeting the inclusion criteria and meeting none of the exclusion criteria. As there were a high number of articles reporting findings on predatory journals, they were further screened re-evaluated for relevance and for any deviation from the theme of this study. Findings: This paper illustrates and examines predatory publishing regarding academic journals, as well as offering a list of features to use in identifying predatory publications. The report concludes with a discussion of proposed solutions on what should be done to eliminate or mitigate the challenges of this development. Originality/Value: In this paper, we will discuss predatory journals, and basic characteristic in identifying them.

Authors and Affiliations

Kenneth Nwanua Ohei,Sam Lubbe,

Keywords

Related Articles

Investigating the Mediating Role of Organizational Culture in the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of transformational leadership dimensions on organizational effectiveness with respect to the mediating role of organizational culture. Methodology: The s...

Examining the dimensions of big data privacy (Block chain solution for privacy protection)

Purpose: In the past, big data was the concern of governments and large commercial industries, and so these organizations had infrastructures separate from the public network to store and process their data. But today, b...

Opportunities and Challenges of Applying Artificial Intelligence in the Financial Sectors and Startups during the Coronavirus Outbreak

Purpose: The main goal of this article is the comprehensive study of the applications of artificial intelligence in financial sectors in addition to startups and its impacts on such cases along with Covid19. Methodo...

Assessment of Cyber Risks in an IoT-based Supply Chain using a Fuzzy Decision-Making Method

Purpose: The Internet of Things (IoT) is a relatively new paradigm that is growing rapidly in modern wireless communication scenarios. The main idea of this concept is the pervasive presence of all kinds of objects aroun...

Analyzing Success Factors of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): A Study in Iranian Context

Purpose: This study aims to identify and analyze the success factors of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) following the lines of dynamic capabilities and resources-based views. Methodology: To achieve this o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP711372
  • DOI -
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kenneth Nwanua Ohei, Sam Lubbe, (2022). Predatory Publication in Science and Ethical Principles: Features and Solutions. International Journal of Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 2(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-711372