Preface

Journal Title: LIMES: Borderland Studies - Year 2009, Vol 2, Issue 2

Abstract

The concept of civilization is inseparable from the concept of region. On the one hand, every civilization develops in a region to be contrasted to other uncivilized regions. On the other hand, we can speak about different regions with different civilizations. Every civilization covers the whole of cultural phenomena, which often are contradictory and inconsistent. Additionally, the very civilization develops being both contradictory inside and hostile outside. In this way we can speak about life of a civilization whereas it is searching for its own identity. The relationship between civilization and culture could be signified not only as relationship between a part and the whole. As civilization could be interpreted as a side of culture, we can speak about the change of the roles between them. The dynamism of the civilization in its interaction with a certain culture presupposes the problems defining one or another civilization both in the past and contemporary life-world. This issue of Limes, named Civilizational Regions: Similarity, Diversity, Unity continues the topic of previous issue Borders of Civilizations as a Cultural, Social and Political Question (Limes, vol. 2, no. 1) in order to develop a certain interdisciplinary discourse between local and global approaches. The issue consists of three parts: 1) European Civilization and Its Region(s); 2) European Civilization, the Sacrality and Secularity; 3) From the Eastern to the Western Civilization and Beyond. The first one deals with the concepts of Central Europe and European demos, while the second one deals with the concepts of sacrum and profanum from European perspective, and the third one – with global world, as well with other civilizations. The authors analyze such European (anti)values as democracy (V. Rubavičius, T. Kačerauskas), liberalism (T. Kačerauskas), belief (M. Broda, G. J. Buijs), regionalism (V. Rubavičius, T. Kačerauskas, A. Juzefovič) contrasting them to authority (M. Broda, G. J. Buijs), power (V. Rubavičius), secularism (M. Broda), and globalism (A. Mickūnas, J. Barevičiūtė).

Authors and Affiliations

Jovilė Barevičiūtė, Tomas Kačerauskas

Keywords

Related Articles

Europietiškasis demos: demokratijos stoka ir nacionaliniai jausmai

Gilinantis į Europos Sąjungą (ES), kaip į pasaulinę civilizacijų sistemą keičiančio civilizacinio darinio integracinius procesus, aiškėja, kad ES ateitis priklausys nuo to, koks požiūris į nacionalinius, etnokultūrinius...

A Comparative Historiography of the Hungarian and Slovakian National Philosophies: A Central European Case

The paper analyses a well-known phenomenon, that of the 19th century Central European so-called “national philosophies”. However, the philosophical heritages of the Central European countries have their roles in the nati...

The Phenomenon of Daoism in Chinese Civilization

In this article Daoism is analyzed in the context of Chinese culture. It is demonstrated how the ideas of Daoism were shaped and matured in the Chinese civilization and how they reflect the peculiarities of the civilizat...

Lithuanian Modern Culture and Images under Global Transformation

The present day discourse of the postmodern European and national self-identification is closely related to a fundamental question, how to evaluate theoretically the essential cultural changes under global transformation...

Interpersonal Communication Value in Globalizing Community

The attention in this article is paid to social changes in terms of global information processes and the influence of these changes on the appearance of some new forms of socialization. The transformation period of moder...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP83397
  • DOI -
  • Views 118
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jovilė Barevičiūtė, Tomas Kačerauskas (2009). Preface. LIMES: Borderland Studies, 2(2), 92-92. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-83397