PRESUPPOSITION AND CAMPAIGN RHETORIC: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRUMP AND HILLARY’S FIRST CAMPAIGN SPEECH

Journal Title: International Journal of English and Literature (IJEL) - Year 2018, Vol 8, Issue 3

Abstract

Considering the language phenomenon and its power in political discourse, this article sought to discover the use of presupposition triggers and its use to construct campaign rhetoric of the first campaign speech delivered by Trump and Hillary (2015) for the US presidential election 2016. Through descriptive qualitative, this study using theory of presupposition triggers proposed by Levinson (1983) and Yule (2010) discovered non-significant difference of frequency of presupposition use by Trump and Hillary; however, significant gap was found in several types of presupposition triggers (i.e. Factive, Pronoun, Temporal Clause, Comparison and Contrast, and Question). Moreover, Implicative and Non-factive were only found in Hillary’s speech, not in Trump’s speech. This study also employed Critical Discourse Analysis to discover the message of utterances containing presupposition triggers and categorized them based on the components of rhetoric campaign proposed by Medhrust (2005). This analysis found that both campaign speeches delivered by Trump and Hillary met all components (i.e. Agenda-setting, Framing, Character Construction, and Emotional Resonance) by the use of presupposition.

Authors and Affiliations

Keywords

Related Articles

LEARNERS’ EXPERIENCES IN INTEGRATING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN THEIR FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING

The high technological developments make foreign language contacts easier than ever. Learners not only get those language contacts in the classroom, but also outside of the class. With the exposures from kinds of digital...

The Shift in Perception: Western Soap in the Indian Context

Serials are a major source of entertainment throughout the world and every country produces its own variety to satisfy its audiences. Same is the case in India, which produces heaps of television serials in its national...

The Change of Meaning of the Word 'Pengantin': "The Use of Word 'Pengantin' in Suicide Bomb Case"

This study discussesabout the change of the word meaning of“pengantin” which is used in the case of suicide bomb. The purpose of this study is to know the original emergence of the word “pengantin”in the case of suicide...

Poster Presentations for Promoting Vocabulary Learning among Tertiary Level Students

The present paper attempts to explore the advantages of using posters in fostering vocabulary as a self-directed learning tool among professional students at the tertiary level. A poster is a printed or manually designed...

A Biopolitical Deconstructive Reading of the Sheltered Workshops with Reference to David Freeman's Play Creeps

The paper attempts to study the effectiveness of sheltered workshops in the light of the experiences of people with disabilities. While the concept of sheltered workshop aims at transforming the 'zoe' of the disabled per...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP376675
  • DOI -
  • Views 98
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

(2018). PRESUPPOSITION AND CAMPAIGN RHETORIC: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRUMP AND HILLARY’S FIRST CAMPAIGN SPEECH. International Journal of English and Literature (IJEL), 8(3), 1-14. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-376675