Private Enforcement and Opt-out System Risks, Rewards and Legal Safeguards
Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2018, Vol 11, Issue 18
Abstract
The EU Antitrust Damages Actions Directive does not include provisions for collective redress. Each EU member state is free to provide national regulation on this matter. The Portuguese legal system provided regulation on actio popularis since 1995. The ‘rational apathy’ of individual consumers may lead to non-reparation of damage and be of significant benefit for the company that is in breach of the law.The opt-out models solve the crucial economic problem caused by a large number of consumers or clients who have suffered a small loss because of competition law infringements. Under those circumstances, it is rational to be apathetic, because it can be foreseen that the cost of filing for compensatory damages will exceed the recovery obtained from the defendant. Such rational apathy of the parties injured by competition law infringements favours the wrongfully acting companies by not extracting their illegal gains from them. By not requiring the active consent of each of the claimants, the opt-out model is able to override rational apathy of consumers
Authors and Affiliations
Maria Elisabete Ramos
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP465675
- DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2018.11.18.4
- Views 255
- Downloads 0
Workshop – Reform of Regulation 1/2003: Effectiveness of the NCAs and Beyond. Warsaw, 28 April 2017 (conference report)
An International Workshop entitled ‘Reform of Regulation 1/2003 – Effectiveness of the NCAs and Beyond’ was held at the University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management on the 28 April 2017. It was organized jointly by the Co...
Proving the Grounds for Compensation – Reflections on Private Enforcement in the Polish Cement Cartel Case. Case Comment to the Judgment of the Court of Appeals in Cracow of 10 January 2014 (Ref. No IACa 1322/13)
Despite the fact that the right to full compensation of harm caused by the breach of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU was confirmed in European Union jurisprudence many years ago,and that actions for damages for competition law...
Review of the New Polish Model of Abstract Control of Standard Forms of Agreements Concluded with Consumers
The Polish Act of 5 August 2015 amending the Act on Competition and Consumer Protection and certain other acts introduced several changes intended to strengthen consumer protection. Its substantial part concerns the abst...
Anna Piszcz (ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries, University of Warsaw Faculty of Management Press,Warsaw 2017, 307 pages
The Book entitled ‘Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries’, edited by Professor Anna Piszcz, was published in Warsaw, Poland in 2017. The publication date of this book was pe...
The Scope of the Implementation of the Damages Directive in CEE States
The Damages Directive has a rather limited scope, focusing only on damages claims stemming from anticompetitive agreements or abuse of a dominant position, provided such conduct was able to affect trade between EU Member...