Private Enforcement and Opt-out System Risks, Rewards and Legal Safeguards

Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2018, Vol 11, Issue 18

Abstract

The EU Antitrust Damages Actions Directive does not include provisions for collective redress. Each EU member state is free to provide national regulation on this matter. The Portuguese legal system provided regulation on actio popularis since 1995. The ‘rational apathy’ of individual consumers may lead to non-reparation of damage and be of significant benefit for the company that is in breach of the law.The opt-out models solve the crucial economic problem caused by a large number of consumers or clients who have suffered a small loss because of competition law infringements. Under those circumstances, it is rational to be apathetic, because it can be foreseen that the cost of filing for compensatory damages will exceed the recovery obtained from the defendant. Such rational apathy of the parties injured by competition law infringements favours the wrongfully acting companies by not extracting their illegal gains from them. By not requiring the active consent of each of the claimants, the opt-out model is able to override rational apathy of consumers

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Elisabete Ramos

Keywords

Related Articles

Private Antitrust Enforcement Without Punitive Damages: A Half-Baked Reform?

Directive 2014/104/EU on private antitrust enforcement opted for the exclusion of punitive damages from the category of recoverable damages following a violation of antitrust law. This article will outline the concept of...

Overview of Kazakhstani New Anti-monopoly Regulation

The main statute governing competition in Kazakhstan is the Entrepreneurial Code, first adopted in October 2015. Section 4 of the Code in particular is aimed at the protection of competition in Kazakhstan...

Energy Security as a Priority for CEE countries. Is the King Naked?

he aim of this article is to assess the implementation process of the EU energy security policy in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. In the EU, energy security remains a crucial issue for...

The Gazprom Case: Lessons of the Past For the Future

Under the EU Merger Regulation, if the Commission has concerns that a merger may significantly affect competition in the European Union, the merging companies may propose modifications to the project that would guarantee...

Anna Piszcz (ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries, University of Warsaw Faculty of Management Press,Warsaw 2017, 307 pages

The Book entitled ‘Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries’, edited by Professor Anna Piszcz, was published in Warsaw, Poland in 2017. The publication date of this book was pe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP465675
  • DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2018.11.18.4
  • Views 227
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Maria Elisabete Ramos (2018). Private Enforcement and Opt-out System Risks, Rewards and Legal Safeguards. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 11(18), 85-114. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-465675