PROBLEM OF THE ALKALINITY DEGREE DIAGNOSTIC IN THE SOILS OF THE NORTHWEST OF THE BLACK SEA REGION

Abstract

According to the results of the study of soils in the Northwest of the Black Sea region, it is determined that here, in the profile of vorony-calcic and calcic Chernozems, both residual and weak alkalinity are manifested. It was found out, nowadays, in the national soil science, there are no clear criteria for the selection of sodic soils and for the determination of their alkalinity degree. Furthermore, there is also the question of the differentiation of the actually sodic and residual-sodic soils. It has been established that on the territory of the Northwest of the Black Sea region polygenetic soils – vorony-calcic and calcic Chernozems weakly and residual-sodic were formed and the diagnostics of their classification and taxonomic position for the moment is rather ambiguous. The diagnostic of the alkalinity degree of vorony-calcic and calcic Chernozems in the Northwest of the Black Sea region was carried out in four methodological approaches. It was established, that it is impossible to carry out precise and unambiguous diagnostics of the alkalinity degree of soils of the territory of the study according to existing methods. Thus, the sodic and residual-sodic soils, according to classification of 1977, are almost entirely positioned as weakly sodic in accordance with the “Field determinant of soils”. In turn, taking into account the Novikova approach, the status of these same soils varies from non-sodic to solonetzes according to the degree of illuviation, the final diagnosis of which, however, contradicts the low content of exchangeable sodium. An integral approach to the determination of the alkalinity degree of soils is proposed, which is based on the chronological features of the course and direction of the sodification process. According to this approach, if the alkalinity of the studied soils is relict, its degree should be diagnosed by the illuviation of silt and by the content of exchange Na+ (Ni> 8 %, Na+<3 % – residual-sodic soils, Ni> 8 %, Na+ ≥ 3 % –sodic soils).In turn, in the case of the modern alkalinity, its degree should be determined by the ratio Ca2+/Mg2+ (<4,8) and by the content of the exchangeable Na+ (<3 % – residual-sodic soils, and ≥3 % – sodic soils).

Authors and Affiliations

Mykhailo Bibik, Hryhorii Moroz, Vitalii Kyrylenko, Artem Kuzmenko

Keywords

Related Articles

SOIL-GEOGRAPHICAL ZONATION OF LVIV OBLAST: STRUCTURE AND PRINCIPLES

The scheme of soil-geographical zonation of Lviv oblast is developed on the principles of structural approach to the spatial organization of soil cover. Criteria for allocation of the ranked taxonomic units, their spatia...

Polish-Ukrainian seminar “Weathering of gypsum and anhydrite rocks”

It is a review of the Polish-Ukrainian seminar “Weathering of gypsum and anhydrite rocks”, which was held in Warsaw.

THE TOPONYMIC LEGACY OF THE TATAR EXPANSION PERIOD IN UKRAINE

In European historiography, the influential influence of immigrants from Mongolia on the social, cultural and economic life of the Eurasian people, enslaved by them in the 13th century, is marked by the Latin term Pax Mo...

THE SOILS OF THE CARPATHIAN REGION OF UKRAINE AS OBJECTS OF SCIENTIFIC TOURISM

Scientific tourism includes ecological, ethno-cultural, underwater, cognitive one and many other types of tourism, the main feature of which is active participation of tourists in the tour, and not just acquisition of in...

STATE OF WATER RESOURCES USAGE OF UKRAINE

The state of the use of water from natural water bodies for water supply of industries and population of the regions of Ukraine form available water facilities is highlighted. The total share of land under water and open...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP317406
  • DOI -
  • Views 68
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mykhailo Bibik, Hryhorii Moroz, Vitalii Kyrylenko, Artem Kuzmenko (2017). PROBLEM OF THE ALKALINITY DEGREE DIAGNOSTIC IN THE SOILS OF THE NORTHWEST OF THE BLACK SEA REGION. Вісник Львівського університету. Серія географічна, 51(), 21-32. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-317406